when lighting strikes the lightning dosnt stay the way it ws it dissapears away and it moves some where else and when it moves it changes its shape that is why lightning is a physical change
lighting is a chemical change
Lighting a match is a chemical change.
It is a chemical change.
Lighting a match.
lighting a match from a matchbox is a chemical change.
Mainly chemical (oxidation).
This is a little tricky. Striking a match is a physical act, but it does induce chemical changes. It depends on exactly what you mean by "lighting", ultimately. The end result is definitely a chemical change.
Light is a form of energy, not a change. Light can be produced by both chemical changes (such as fire), and physical changes (such as very high velocity impacts).
when lighting strikes the lightning dosnt stay the way it ws it dissapears away and it moves some where else and when it moves it changes its shape that is why lightning is a physical change
Examples of chemical changes: * Burning of paper * Rusting of iron Examples of physical reactions: * Melting of ice * Melting of wax
The answer is lighting a match box because when doing so, the match goes into flames and flammability is a chemical change. When cutting a snowflake, the substances do not change, neither does it change when drying wet clothes. The person earlier said drying wet clothes, but he/she is wrong because when you dry wet clothes, the water goes through a physical change called evaporation, which is NOT a chemical change. I hope this helps. Good luck on your chapter assessments(I'm doing mine too). :)
Is the lighting of a bulb a reversible or an irreversible change