MDCCXLIV = 1744
The numerals given are invalid Roman numerals so therefore there is no equivalent in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
In most of the world, the numbers in daily normal use are based on Indo-Arabic numerals.
There is none because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals.
437. D is 500, C before it is minus 100, so 400. X is 10, so XXX is 30. V is 5, and I is 1, so 7.
14.99 is a mathematical quantity. It means that same thing in any language - especially those using Indo-Arabic numerals.
No, Arabic is not an Indo-European language. It belongs to the Semitic language family.
It simplifies calculations as much as changing from Roman numerals to Indo-Arabic numbers did. It is international so no translation needed between nations
It simplifies calculations as much as changing from Roman numerals to Indo-Arabic numbers did. It is international so no translation needed between nations
It simplifies calculations as much as changing from Roman numerals to Indo-Arabic numbers did. It is international so no translation needed between nations
Farsi is the official language of Iran and belongs to the Indo-Iranian branch of the Indo-European languages, while Arabic is the official language of many countries in the Middle East and North Africa and belongs to the Semitic branch of languages. Farsi is written in the Persian script, whereas Arabic is written in the Arabic script.
Indo-Arabic refers to the combination of Indian and Arabic influences, often seen in architecture, culture, and language in regions where these two civilizations have interacted, such as South Asia and the Middle East. It can also refer to the use of Arabic script to write Indian languages.
Yes, Arabic is a Semitic language belonging to the Afro-Asiatic language family, not the Indo-European language family. Arabic is spoken by millions of people primarily in the Middle East and North Africa.