In both cases, you have governments motivated by a discriminatory sense of superiority evicting a native people from their homeland through the use of legal mechanisms and violence. The way that the Islamic State has forced Assyrians out of most of Ninewah Province, confiscated their property, and enslaved some of them is eerily reminiscent of the types of acts the US Americans performed under the Indian Removal Act.
The Indian Removal Act
The president speaking about Indian removal in his inaugural address was Andrew Jackson. In his 1829 address, he emphasized the need for relocating Native American tribes to lands west of the Mississippi River, which he believed would protect their way of life and promote the expansion of American settlers. This policy ultimately led to the forced removal of thousands of Native Americans, known as the Trail of Tears.
Indian Removal Act
justification for the indian removal act
Indian removal.
Thomas Benton believed that Indian removal was a priority because he viewed it as essential for the expansion and development of the United States. He argued that relocating Native American tribes would open up land for American settlers and promote economic growth. Benton perceived the westward movement as a manifestation of Manifest Destiny, believing it was the nation's duty to spread its civilization. Additionally, he often framed Indian removal as a way to protect Native Americans from the encroaching settlers' influence and violence.
The Indian removal did start in 1830 and stopped in 1860. The Indian Removal Act was passed by the senate on April 24, 1830.
Oklahoma
Legacy of indian Removal
The final phase of the Indian removal plan was the removal of the Cherokees. The Indian Removal Act was a law passed by Congress during Andrew Jackson presidency on May 28, 1830.
The trail that was caused by the Indian removal act was the Trail of Tears.
The Indian Removal Act