Article V of the Constitution provides two methods to propose amendments and two methods for ratification. Constitutional amendment proposals in method one are by joint resolution of the Congress with a 2/3 vote in each house. (This is the only method that has been used.) Method two is by way of petitions to Congress by 2/3 of the states to conduct a convention for proposing amendments, and then holding such a convention. (An Article V convention has never been held).
Amendments proposed by either the congressional method or the convention method are then submitted to the states for ratification. There are two possible methods here as well. Ratification can be done by way of the votes of the state legislatures or by specially elected delegates to state ratification conventions. In either case, ratification requires the votes of 3/4 of the states. The convention method was used in the case of the 21st Amendment (repeal of prohibition).
An amended version of the Virginia plan was adopted at the Constitutional convention. The Constitutional convention was held in Philadelphia from May 25th to September 17th, 1787.
Article 5 of the US Constitution establishes the procedure by which the Constitution may be amended.
The Constitution can be amended in two primary areas: through Congress or a constitutional convention. Congress can propose an amendment with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Alternatively, a constitutional convention can be called by two-thirds of state legislatures, where amendments can be proposed. Both methods require ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures or conventions to become effective.
George Washington stated that a constitutional door is opened for amendment hereafter when the Declaration of Independence was created. He meant that the document could be amended for future changes and necessity that occurred.
Once policies are written into state constitutions, they become harder to change, requiring a new constitutional amendment.
I'm not sure if this is what you are going for. The Constitution of the United States is one single document. It has been amended 27 times and certainly it will be amended again, but it is one document. There are countless documents that have been generated in support of its requirements. This is unlike the constitutional system of the United Kingdom. The UK is of course a monarchy, but the government is constitutional in nature. But there is a collection of foundational documents and materials that together guide the governing of the nation.
The Constitution can be informally amended through basic legislation by Congress passing laws that interpret its provisions in new ways, thereby shaping the application of constitutional principles. For example, laws that establish specific rights or procedures can expand or clarify constitutional guarantees without formally altering the text. This process allows for flexibility and adaptation to changing societal needs while maintaining the Constitution's foundational framework. Such legislative actions, along with judicial interpretations, contribute to the evolving understanding of constitutional rights and responsibilities.
what is amended water?
They change it to Constitutional Convention because Articles of Confederation was to weak.
Yes, fundamental rights in many democracies can be amended, but the process is often subject to specific constitutional provisions. In India, for example, while the Constitution allows for amendments to fundamental rights, the Supreme Court has ruled that certain basic features of the Constitution, including fundamental rights, cannot be altered. This ensures a balance between the need for constitutional flexibility and the protection of essential individual rights. However, the amendment process typically requires a higher threshold of political consensus.
it can be amended by special majority
Amended Christadelphians was created in 1898.