people are allowed to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Protects individual rights not to incriminate
the fourth amendment is the Bill Of Rights
Too lengthy to enumerate here - see the below link and see for yourself.
All of them. If you want to be more specific, the first amendment protects the individual's right to freedom of speech, religion, and to question the government's authority by petitioning and assembling peaceful protests. The second amendment protects the individual's right to own weapons. The fourth amendment protects the individual's right to privacy. Read the Bill of Rights, my friend. It's all there.
Fifth amendment
they are connected by how they work and are placed.
The TSA balances security measures with the protection of individual rights under the Fourth Amendment by implementing procedures that aim to ensure safety while respecting privacy and civil liberties. This includes using advanced technology for screening, conducting thorough training for staff, and following strict guidelines to minimize intrusiveness and uphold constitutional rights.
Bill of Rights
Gregg C. Georgia, a significant U.S. Supreme Court case from 1976, primarily dealt with the Eighth Amendment regarding the death penalty rather than the Fourth Amendment. However, the case's implications on legal standards and constitutional rights can indirectly relate to broader discussions about individual rights, including protections against unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment. Overall, while the case itself does not directly address Fourth Amendment issues, it contributes to the ongoing dialogue about constitutional protections in the criminal justice system.
The fourth amendment to the US Constitution deals with the rights of citizens to have due process and requires warrants for searches. Judicial review is not really relevant to this amendment.
When you become of legal age and gain these rights yes, until then no.
The Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, is applied to the states through the doctrine of incorporation via the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This means that state governments are also required to respect individuals' rights against unreasonable searches and seizures, as established by the Supreme Court in cases like Mapp v. Ohio (1961). As a result, evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is generally inadmissible in state courts, reinforcing the protection of individual privacy rights.