dvjhegyghgjhfujhi
picho esla palabra i puto bicth
The Articles of Confederation did not create the executive or judicial branches.
The articles of confederation gave almost no power to the federal government. They had to ask the states to get anything done. It was not working for building a country. They met and created the US Constitution.
The Articles in the Constitution explain the different branches of government and explains their powers. They lay a basic framework for the government.
Because the AOC did not provide a stable, strong central government. The AOC also did not give the government the ability to tax, AOC only gave them the ability to raise an army, and sign formal treaties.
It created a stronger federal government that would be superior in many but not all ways to the state governments. The Articles of Confederation simply created a loos conglomeration of the states each acting as if it were a country of its own. In many ways the states could not get along with one another, such as in areas of interstate commerce. Something had to be done to make the states co-operate with one another so the stronger federal system was created.
The Articles of Confederation did not create the executive or judicial branches.
One!
A government with legislative and judicial branches.
I believe there were two...
the constitution established three strong branches of government
Executive and Judicial Branch
The branches of government did not have an equal share in power.
creating the three branches of government
State and National Government. Did not have an executive or judiciary branch in national.
A lot of ways. Perhaps the most important differences are that the Constitution had three branches, instead of just one, which balanced power better than in the Articles of Confederation, and it gave more power to the federal government.
YOUR MOM lol
Only one branch was set up under the Articles -- the Legislative branch.