The killer had not really fooled the officers as much as he thought.
an objective narrator only says what really happens
The narrator would be considered unreliable. This type of narration can create tension and intrigue for the reader as they try to discern the truth from the narrator's perspective.
If the narrator says "I did this..." then it is 1st person If the narrator says "You did this" it is 2nd person and if the narrator says "He/She/They did this" then it is 3rd person.
One way that Harris is different from the narrator is that Harris is 2 years younger. Another difference is that Harris is uninhibited and says what is on his mind while the narrator does not.
ur probably screwed
Answer this ques . Have the narrator slip and reveal an unexpected fact.
An objective narrator presents information without bias or personal feelings, allowing readers to form their own opinions. In contrast, an unreliable narrator may distort or manipulate information, casting doubt on the accuracy of the story being told.
How honestly does the narrator represent the world Does the narrator have something to hide/cover up. Does he have reason to "pad the truth" Does the narrator actually understand what is going on Is the narrator biased Does the narrator contradict what he/she says
If he likes you for your looks he probably doesn't love you. If he only wants you for your vagina he doesn't love you.
Just accept it. He is probably telling you the truth.
A nurse would probably refer the patient to an eating disorder specialist.
Probably, when ash leaves primape in the episode "The Punchy Pokemon" The narrator says maybe they'll meet up again someday.