Not that Often, According to scientist its about 30 years.
The edges of the plate
There was no London epicentered earthquake that year. If you are referring to the Welsh earthquake of that year (which was felt in London), it is likely to have been at least 5.5 - 6.0 on the righter scale
An earthquake zone is likely to be along fault lines or where two or more tectonic plates meet or a chain of volcanoes parallel to a continental coast.
While a magnitude 9 could cause extensive damage, a magnitude 10 is almost unimaginable. There would be so much pressure on the Earth's crust that it would crack, causing uncountable volcanic eruptions, tsunamis, and unrepairable damage. A possible 900000 or more deaths would occur.
yes as they are usually on the edge of tectonic plates which is the reason that the earthquake happened
A magnitude 9.0 earthquake would likely have global impacts, causing widespread damage and triggering tsunamis across multiple regions. The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, with a magnitude of 9.1-9.3, is an example of how such a large quake can have far-reaching consequences.
earthquakes are most likely to occur on the rim of tectonic plates
The scale goes down to -3.0, which is an earthquake equivalent to someone jumping off a small wall.
It is when two tectonic plates collide and they rubs, this causes the rubble which you get from the earthquake. You only get earthquakes if your country is in between a tectonic plate or on the tectonic plate.
Two-story homes made out of bricks.
I heard while back that the state of Florida is the least likely to have an earthquake. But Hurricanes...that's another story.
young mountains along an ocean coast.