answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In the 1960's scientists uncovered new evidence that seemed to support Wegener's theory.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How long was it before new evidence emerged to support wegener's original theory?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What evidence did Wegeners have to support his theory?

Fossils support his hypothesis.


Does the case of mesosaurus support wegeners theory of continental drift?

yes it does.


Give an example of evidence from land features that supported wegeners idea of continetal drift?

There are several pieces of evidence from land features which support Wegener's idea of continental drift. One example is that if you line up the maps of South America and Africa you will see that the mountain ranges line up, which is strong evidence that the two continents were once one.


What does corroborate mean?

Corroborate means to strengthen or support with evidence.


How do locations of mountains support wegeners idea about how mountain form?

mountains usually occur in narrow bands along the edges of continents


How do the locations of mountains support Wegeners's idea about how mountains form?

mountains usually occur in narrow bands along the edges of continents


How do the locations of mountains support Wegeners idea about how mountains form?

mountains usually occur in narrow bands along the edges of continents


Why does scientific evidence support scientific theories?

use scientific evidence to support your answer


How did Alfred Wegeners theory support the theory of seafloor spreading?

Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift suggested that continents move over time on Earth's surface. This theory provided support for the concept of seafloor spreading, which explains how new oceanic crust forms at mid-ocean ridges and spreads outward. Both theories contributed to the development of the theory of plate tectonics, which explains the large-scale movements of Earth's lithosphere.


Why is it important for historians to corroborate the information found in pieces of historical evidence?

Answer this question… Different pieces of evidence may contradict the original information.


What question should a writer ask when choosing evidence to support a claim?

Is the evidence from the best source I can find


In what kind of proof do you assume the opposite of what you want to prove?

This is a "proof by contradiction", where the evidence would fail to support the reverse assumption, giving credence to the original hypothesis.