use scientific evidence to support your answer
There are no scientific theories that disprove evolution. Evolution is a well-supported scientific theory that is backed by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields. Any claims to the contrary are not supported by scientific consensus.
if new evidence doesn't support a scientific theory, scientists will either revise the theory to accommodate the new evidence or discard the theory altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. This process is crucial for the progress of science as it ensures that theories are continuously tested and refined to reflect our understanding of the natural world.
Scientific theories have changed over time as new evidence is discovered through experiments and observations. As technology advances, scientists can gather more accurate data and refine their theories accordingly. Additionally, the acceptance and rejection of ideas by the scientific community also influence the evolution of scientific theories.
There is no scientific evidence to support the claim that birth control is intentionally being added to the water supply.
In science, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence and testing. The ideas about evolution are called theories because they have been extensively researched, tested, and supported by a wide range of scientific evidence from various fields such as genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. Evolutionary theory is considered one of the most robust and well-supported theories in biology.
There is not enough evidence to support these new theories. More tests and research needs to be carried out before these theories can be proved.
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
why are theories sometimes replaced by new theories
Scientific theories are connected to observations and evidence through the process of hypothesis testing. Scientists use observations and evidence to develop hypotheses, which are then tested through experiments and further observations. If the results support the hypothesis, it can become a theory. Theories are constantly refined and updated based on new evidence and observations.
Yes, they can, if new evidence is discovered to support a change in the theory. Physical theories are not provable in the sense of mathematical theorems. They depend on evidence, and they can be disproved if enough contrary evidence comes up.
Scientific theories are developed through a process of observation, experimentation, and analysis. Scientists gather data to form hypotheses, which are then tested to determine if they are valid. Over time, as more evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it may be elevated to the status of a theory.
They do the experiment again, double check all their calculations, then they come up with a new theory if it's necessary. That's why there's no such thing as a scientific fact, only scientific theories.
This a Study Island Question. The answer is "Scientific Theories are supported by evidence or data."
Experiments.
when enough evidence contradicts earlier ideas
Current theories that conflict with Darwin's theory of evolution include Lamarckism, which suggests acquired traits can be passed down through generations, and Saltationism, which proposes that large evolutionary changes can happen suddenly. Supporters of Lamarckism cite cases of epigenetics as evidence, while proponents of Saltationism point to instances of punctuated equilibrium in the fossil record to support their claims.
Scientists call theories that explain all the evidence and are widely accepted by the scientific community "well-established theories" or "well-supported theories." These theories are based on a large body of evidence and have withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.