You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
bc scientific theories are hypotheses tested enough to be supported by evidence, and a fact is a proven thing. scientific theories are only right until theyre proven wrong
We gotta know it by scientific laws and theories. Scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through formation and testing of hypotheses and can predict the behaviour of the natural world. They both are well supported by observations and experimental evidence. By this we can determine the whole process...Rutherford theory Corrected by Bohr ....
why are theories sometimes replaced by new theories
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena, based on a body of evidence and observations. They are formulated through rigorous testing and can be modified or refined as new evidence emerges. Unlike hypotheses, which are tentative explanations, theories are widely accepted within the scientific community when they withstand extensive scrutiny and experimentation. Importantly, theories do not become "true" in an absolute sense; rather, they are supported by evidence and are the best available explanations at the time.
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena based on a body of evidence and are subject to testing and refinement. They are not mere guesses but rather comprehensive frameworks that can predict outcomes and are supported by repeated experimentation. Importantly, scientific theories can evolve as new evidence emerges, differentiating them from laws, which describe observable phenomena without explaining why they occur. Overall, theories are foundational to scientific understanding and must withstand rigorous scrutiny.
This a Study Island Question. The answer is "Scientific Theories are supported by evidence or data."
There are no scientific theories that disprove evolution. Evolution is a well-supported scientific theory that is backed by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields. Any claims to the contrary are not supported by scientific consensus.
Yes, the concept of the universe not being locally real is supported by scientific evidence and theories, such as quantum mechanics and the phenomenon of entanglement. These theories suggest that particles can be connected regardless of distance, challenging the idea of a locally real universe.
bc scientific theories are hypotheses tested enough to be supported by evidence, and a fact is a proven thing. scientific theories are only right until theyre proven wrong
Scientists call theories that explain all the evidence and are widely accepted by the scientific community "well-established theories" or "well-supported theories." These theories are based on a large body of evidence and have withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.
We gotta know it by scientific laws and theories. Scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through formation and testing of hypotheses and can predict the behaviour of the natural world. They both are well supported by observations and experimental evidence. By this we can determine the whole process...Rutherford theory Corrected by Bohr ....
Scientific theories.
why are theories sometimes replaced by new theories
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena, based on a body of evidence and observations. They are formulated through rigorous testing and can be modified or refined as new evidence emerges. Unlike hypotheses, which are tentative explanations, theories are widely accepted within the scientific community when they withstand extensive scrutiny and experimentation. Importantly, theories do not become "true" in an absolute sense; rather, they are supported by evidence and are the best available explanations at the time.
Scientific evidence supports scientific theories through empirical observations, experiments, and data analysis that consistently confirm the predictions and explanations of the theories. Theories are continuously tested and revised based on new evidence, leading to a more refined and accurate understanding of the natural world. Overall, the robustness and validity of scientific theories are demonstrated through the process of evidence accumulation and verification by multiple independent researchers.
When psychologists state that scientific theories must be supported by empirical evidence, they are emphasizing the importance of using objective data and observations to validate or refute their theories. Empirical evidence refers to information that is obtained through systematic investigation and observation in the real world, rather than relying on personal opinions or beliefs. This process helps ensure that psychological theories are based on reliable and verifiable information, promoting the credibility and validity of the field.