0
What else can I help you with?
Is most scientific ideas are absolute and not subject to change true or false?
false
If nearly all scientists agree with a theory it may be called?
If nearly all scientists agree with a theory, it may be called a scientific consensus. This consensus indicates that the theory is well-supported by extensive evidence and has undergone rigorous testing and peer review. While scientific consensus doesn't guarantee absolute truth, it reflects a strong level of agreement among experts in the field based on current knowledge.
Does a hypothesis have to be provable?
A hypothesis does not have to be definitively provable; rather, it should be testable and falsifiable. This means that it can be subjected to experimentation or observation to determine its validity. The goal of a hypothesis is to provide a plausible explanation or prediction that can be supported or refuted through evidence. Ultimately, the scientific process relies on continual testing and refinement of hypotheses rather than absolute proof.
What is the first factor in scientific notation?
its absolute value is greater than or equal to 1 and less than 10
Why is there is no absolute certainty or scientific truth in a theory?
A "law" contains absolute certainty or scientific truth. A theory is very close to being a law, but without the absoluteness. That is what a theory is. If you have a pretty good idea of how something in science might work you might form a hypothesis (hye-POTH-uh-suss). With enough additional proofs and evidence, a hypothesis may someday turn into a theory.
Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute.?
Theories
What Must Be Supported By Observations And Results From Many Investigations And Are Not Absolute.?
theories :)
Must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
theories :)
Scientific what must be supported by observations and results from many investigators and are not absolute?
Scientific theories.
What must be supported by observations and results from any investigations and are not absolute?
If my memory of third grade serves me, that would be a theory. Theories are based upon observations (e.g.: Observation: That guy's left side looks limp. Theory: He had a stroke) and are not absolute, as until it is tested and proven, there is no way to tell for certain if a theory is true or not.
Why doesnt science offer conclusive proof of phonomena?
Science deals with building a body of knowledge through evidence-based investigations and observations. It aims to explain phenomena based on the available evidence but does not aim to offer absolute proof. This is because scientific understanding is always evolving with new evidence and perspectives.
Is it true that Scientific theories must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
That is correct. If the result of an experiment cannot be replicated (repeated), the theory is weakened or overturned. In addition, results in general are not absolute as it is always possible something has been overlooked that would significantly alter the theory. For example, Newton's theory of gravity was considered to be very good, and explained the motions of the planets about the sun extremely well. Except for Mercury, whose motion did not fit Newton's model. Eventually Einstein developed a superior theory of gravity (general relativity), which accounted for the motion of Mercury.
Is true about Scientific knowledge?
Scientific knowledge is not absolute.
Why is the big bang theory a model and not absolute fact?
All scientific theories are basically just consensuses of postulates to guide scientific research in a search for evidentiary proof. Consequently no theory is absolute fact. In the case of the Big Bang theory we also have the problem that we are trying to figure out what happened billions of years in the past, long before any human beings were around to observe those events directly. We have lots of astronomical observations which are relevant to this theory, but it is possible to imagine more than one way to interpret those observations. That said, you should also know that the evidence for the Big Bang theory is quite strong, and no one working in the field of cosmology has any serious doubt about it. It is very well supported. But it is not absolute fact. Nothing in science is taken as being absolute. For absolute truth, you must turn to religion.
Who supported absolute monarchies?
a French philosopher: Thomas Hobbes
What is mean absolute percentage error?
The mean absolute percent prediction error (MAPE), .The summation ignores observations where yt = 0.
What is true of the work of all science?
It is all doubtable, testable and open to disproof. This is the strength of the scientific method; it is a heuristic. It does not lead to absolute truth. There are some basic observations that are probably undeniable for all of time, but the more speculative or theoretical a scientific principle is, the more it is vulnerable to change or re-interpretation.
