0
What else can I help you with?
Are ogres' ears as succulent as they are rumored to be?
There is no scientific evidence to support the claim that ogres' ears are succulent. This idea likely comes from folklore and fictional stories.
What connection do people with RH- blood have with Angels?
There is no scientific evidence to support a connection between people with RH-negative blood and angels. This idea likely stems from folklore and spiritual beliefs rather than factual information.
How do Scientists know that the first organisms were simple Unicellular Organisms?
microfossils A+ ally barclay
How might the scientists use the cell theory to determine if the object is an organism?
Scientists could use the cell theory to determine if an object is an organism by examining its structure under a microscope for evidence of cells. If the object is composed of cells with a defined nucleus and membrane-bound organelles, it would align with the principles of the cell theory and likely be considered an organism. Additionally, observing characteristics such as growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli would further support this classification.
In witch population of organisms could scientist most likely observe direct evidence of evolutionary change?
A population with a short generation time and large population size would allow scientists to most likely observe direct evidence of evolutionary change. This is because rapid reproduction and high genetic variation increase the chances of observing mutations and natural selection in action.
Why Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if?
Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if new evidence contradicts the existing theory, if the theory fails to explain new observations accurately, or if a more comprehensive theory emerges that better explains the phenomena in question. Scientific theories are constantly refined and updated based on rigorous testing and evidence.
A physical representation of an atom is an example of a scientific?
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory, scientists will most likely
Which action would be most likely scientific research on genetic modification of food?
Scientists providing evidence that genetically modified foods
What technique would most likely be used by forensic scientist?
Forensic scientists use a variety of techniques, such as DNA analysis, fingerprint analysis, ballistics, toxicology, and digital forensics, to analyze evidence from crime scenes. These techniques help them identify suspects, link evidence to a crime, and provide scientific support for criminal investigations.
Are ogres' ears as succulent as they are rumored to be?
There is no scientific evidence to support the claim that ogres' ears are succulent. This idea likely comes from folklore and fictional stories.
How likely out of 1 to 100 is 2012 going to happen'?
It is probably not going to happen (5/100) because there is very little scientific evidence to support 2012, and scientists and other people are concentrating on events later than 2012, thus they believe the world won't end in 2012.
What is the difference between scientific and non-scientific evidence?
Evidence is something observable (measurable) or tangible that provides support to an explanation or shows that the explanation needs to be modified. The term "prove" (in the US, generally) is much more often used within the legal system, not in science, as science doesn't really try to "prove" things, but to support or refute them with evidence. The more evidence, the more likely it is to be true. Evidence, by definition, cannot be non-scientific.
How do you spell florensic?
The likely word is forensic (pertaining to scientific analysis of evidence).
Is the chupa cabra real?
The chupacabra is a mythical creature from Latin American folklore described as a blood-sucking creature that attacks livestock. There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of the chupacabra. It is likely a combination of folklore, urban legends, and hoaxes.
At which stage of scientific thinking are scientists most likely to consider the data and conclusions of other scientists to propose new experiments?
analyzing data
Which of these best describes the basis on which new scientific ideas are accepted or rejected?
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.
How did a man die after masturbating 43 times?
There is no credible evidence or scientific basis to support the claim that a man died from masturbating 43 times. This is likely a myth or an exaggerated story. It is important to be cautious of sensationalized or false information.
