There was no such thing as a reign of terror in the Roman Empire
it went as long Robespierre did.
Until Augustus's reign (the Republic) the Senate ran the Empire, then it was a long line of Emperors.
About 13 months.
He didn't. The largest empire was the British empire. By the time the British empire was in existence, Octavian, an Ancient Roman, was long dead.
The Reign of Terror took place because they had no way of controlling the people so they decided to just kill anyone who got in their way. It went on as long as it did because the people were too afraid to stand up to Robespierre (the man responsible for the start of the Reign of Terror).
In 44BC, after the death of Julius Caesar, who had adopted him.
Stability and prosperity in the Roman Empire, and a 200-year line of Princeps, most with similar goals.
There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.
65 year
about 100 years
7
2000 years, trust me i did a report on them.