There was no such thing as a reign of terror in the Roman Empire
Until Augustus's reign (the Republic) the Senate ran the Empire, then it was a long line of Emperors.
it went as long Robespierre did.
He didn't. The largest empire was the British empire. By the time the British empire was in existence, Octavian, an Ancient Roman, was long dead.
About 13 months.
The Reign of Terror took place because they had no way of controlling the people so they decided to just kill anyone who got in their way. It went on as long as it did because the people were too afraid to stand up to Robespierre (the man responsible for the start of the Reign of Terror).
In 44BC, after the death of Julius Caesar, who had adopted him.
There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.
Stability and prosperity in the Roman Empire, and a 200-year line of Princeps, most with similar goals.
about 100 years
7
65 year
No, the Ottoman empire was long after the Roman empire. After the Roman empire, the byzantine empire followed. The Ottoman Turks did, however, take over the Byzantine captial of Constanope renaming it Istanbul.