Species would survive indefinably in such conditions .
natural selection
make their own food.=)
It will Adapt to it's Environment
Males have sperm in order to fertilise the females ovum. the process of a male fertilising a female caused the genetics of a species to be constantly on the move thereby making the species stronger and more able to survive,
bacteriostatic, not bacteriocidal
A species must be able to find food, shelter, and water in order to survive and reproduce. Until a species is able to meet its essential needs, it is not able to reproduce and survive.
No. It is not necessary for EVERY member of a species to reproduce in order for the species to survive. Consider humans. Some are infertile and can't reproduce, and some choose not to reproduce, yet the human species survives.
A species that is in danger of becoming extinct. There are low numbers of the animal and they may not be able to reproduce fast enough to survive as a species. Or they may face some environmental factor that is causing them to not reproduce enough to survive.
They must be able to reproduce, however a large percentage of the offspring never reach sexual maturity and only a smaller percentage of those will reproduce in many cases.
natural selection
Not necessarily.Take the example of Homo sapiens (Human beings).Around the world, a LARGE number of women may be infertile (cannot reproduce) or will not be willing to reproduce.Despite the fact that many do not reproduce, you continue to see many human beings.
make their own food.=)
There are no animals discovered fully, but some people and scientists have agreed there is 5 species of animal are able to everyone if these.
It will Adapt to it's Environment
Males have sperm in order to fertilise the females ovum. the process of a male fertilising a female caused the genetics of a species to be constantly on the move thereby making the species stronger and more able to survive,
sterile
So it can further its existence