it would take apporximately 4.2 seconds, jduging the wind speed in space, if light speed technology did exist.
With current technology, it would take NASA thousands of years to travel 600 light years using conventional spacecraft. The vast distance and limitations of our current propulsion systems make such a journey unfeasible in a reasonable timescale.
Yes, that is a "conventional" source of light.
30 years(in Apollo spacecrafts)
Traveling at the speed of light, it would take approximately 2.5 million years to reach the Andromeda galaxy, which is about 2.5 million light-years away from Earth. With current technology, it would take tens of thousands of years to reach Andromeda using conventional spacecraft.
The suggested motor oil for a 1997 Mitsubishi Galant is a light 5W30 conventional oil. Older engines made need a little heavier oil to prevent leaking.
no
You had better travel near the speed of light or you will not see much of the universe. Unfortunately travelling near the speed is not yet possible, so you are out of luck.
Traveling at the speed of light, it would take a spacecraft 40 years to reach a star located 40 light-years away from Earth.
Gliese 581 is around 20.3 light years away from Earth. Traveling at the speed of light (approximately 186,282 miles per second), it would take about 20.3 years to reach Gliese 581. However, with our current technology, it would take significantly longer using conventional spacecraft.
At a typical 18.6 miles per second the spacecraft travels at 1/10,000 of the speed of light, therefore it would take 43,000 years.
If my memory serves me correctly, and I hope it does, it would take man approx 1000 years to travel one light year. If I am wrong, I ask for somebody to please inform me as I would appreciate the correction.
A conventional light bulb consists of glass, metal, and gas, but no oil