0
23,000
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How many casulaties were there during the Battle of Antietam?
23000 casualties
How many union casualties where there at Antietam?
The Union lost 12,000 killed, wounded, or captured at the Battle of Antietam.
How many casualties of the Battle of Antietam creek?
The Union army suffered over 2,100 combat deaths at Antietam.
How many casualties in the confederate states in the Battle of Antietam?
About 2,700 killed and 9,029 wounded.
How many causalities were there in the Battle of Antietam?
Nearly 23,000 casualties in killed, wounded, and missing resulted from the fight along Antietam Creek.
How many people died in the battle of Antietam and when was it?
26,134 people died at the battle of Antietam. About 13,700 of the total casualties were Confederates and about 12,400 death were of the Union. This battle was the bloodiest day in American history. The battle of Antietam took place on September 17, 1862.
How many men total fought at the Battle of Antietam?
In the Battle of Antietam there were 22,700 casualties.12,400 Union10,300 ConfederateNote: This statistic does not include the number of horses killed
What battle caused the highest number of casualties during the civil war?
Antietam
How many casualties did the Union have in the US Civil War Battle of Antietam in 1862?
Battle losses are often measured in terms of casualties. Deaths as a result of combat wounds may be strung out over days and weeks. With that said, both sides in the Battle of Antietam suffered casualties close to 12,000 for each side.
What the bloodyest battle of the civil war?
Gettysburg. And the biggest casualties on a single day was Antietam.
This battle was the bloodiest single-day battle in US history?
The battle of Antietam, Maryland was the worst single day battle with about 27,000 casualties in 12 hours. There were several other battles with as many or more casualties, but they were multi-day events.
What happened in Maryland during the civil war?
Battle of Antietam, 23000 casualties, in MD. Sept 1862
