50 percent
50 percent
none becuz chuck norris would kill all survivors
No, but a certain child's name would be proper. Children is just in general, but Jimmy, for example, would be proper.
Child is a common noun. The proper noun Child would be a family name, as in Robert D. Child, the artist.
Lawn is killed by herbacides, lack of proper watering, fungus, insect infestation, and excessive fertilizing
In French, "I killed" is translated as "J'ai tué."
What about them??? u need a proper question for a proper answer.
Britain children have to be more proper.
No, "children" is a common noun, as it is a general term used to refer to more than one young individual. Proper nouns typically refer to specific names of people, places, or things.
Young children were typically killed, since they were viewed as useless. Children over 12 had a better chance of surviving, because they could be forced to work at the labor camps. The little children were sent off to killing camps along with the elderly and sick. The forced "labor" was often pointless and humiliating, and imposed without proper equipment, clothing, nourishment, or rest.
It is proper to invite only the children that will be part of the wedding, or to invite only immediate family member's children, ie. nieces & nephews. However, it is not appropiate to invite some family's children and not others, or some friend's children and not others.