Three civilians were killed during the incident. Two civilians died after the incident, and 11 were wounded.
The Boston Massacre took place in Boston, on March 5, 1770. The massacre which was carried out by British army soldiers resulted in 5 people dying and six others being injured.
Five people (colonist)
-Shyshy!:)
5
five
The Boston Massacre was part of a massive propaganda campaign used by the Patriots to stir up the colonists into getting angry at the British. The Boston Massacre was not so much a massacre, but the accidental shooting of 5 people by British soldiers placed in Boston after the mobs of colonists were hitting the soldiers with rocks and ice. This was an effective way of getting many colonists passionate about war with England. The amount of soldiers involved in the incident is unknown.
The boston massacre got so much attention because of the propaganda the Paul revere made-because it was greatly over exaggerated and it proposed that a lot of people died when only five did. Because of this, many of the colonist and or patriots were extremely angry at the British, once again. Thus- this is one of the events leading up to the American revolution.
Boston Massacrea riot in Boston (March 5, 1770) arising from the resentment of Boston colonists toward British troops quartered in the city, in which the troops fired on the mob and killed several persons.
The people of Boston were upset at the massacre, because the British were not supposed to fire and kill people of the colonies. By the soldiers shooting at the colonists, by accident or not, angered the people more against Britain and made them want to rebel more from their tyranny. The presence of the British soldiers were considered a threat, and that England did not trust the colonies. This was in part because the colonies did not agree with the taxes that Britain imposed on them.
This statement is not accurate. The Boston Massacre, which occurred in 1770, was a violent clash between British soldiers and a crowd of colonists in Boston. It did not involve any orders regarding settlement in the Ohio Valley. The Ohio Valley was a much later focal point of conflict during the American Revolution and frontier expansion in the late 18th century.
The Boston Massacre was part of a massive propaganda campaign used by the Patriots to stir up the colonists into getting angry at the British. The Boston Massacre was not so much a massacre, but the accidental shooting of 5 people by British soldiers placed in Boston after the mobs of colonists were hitting the soldiers with rocks and ice. This was an effective way of getting many colonists passionate about war with England. The amount of soldiers involved in the incident is unknown.
Yes, you can make a video on any subject without sound, but to make a convincing video about whether or not the Boston Massacre was a massacre or propaganda would take a lot of research into the Boston Massacre that supports your thesis about which it was. Also, you might consider adding sound, since it would make the video much more interesting than writing words on the video that people would have to read.
The boston massacre got so much attention because of the propaganda the Paul revere made-because it was greatly over exaggerated and it proposed that a lot of people died when only five did. Because of this, many of the colonist and or patriots were extremely angry at the British, once again. Thus- this is one of the events leading up to the American revolution.
Boston Massacrea riot in Boston (March 5, 1770) arising from the resentment of Boston colonists toward British troops quartered in the city, in which the troops fired on the mob and killed several persons.
The people of Boston were upset at the massacre, because the British were not supposed to fire and kill people of the colonies. By the soldiers shooting at the colonists, by accident or not, angered the people more against Britain and made them want to rebel more from their tyranny. The presence of the British soldiers were considered a threat, and that England did not trust the colonies. This was in part because the colonies did not agree with the taxes that Britain imposed on them.
This statement is not accurate. The Boston Massacre, which occurred in 1770, was a violent clash between British soldiers and a crowd of colonists in Boston. It did not involve any orders regarding settlement in the Ohio Valley. The Ohio Valley was a much later focal point of conflict during the American Revolution and frontier expansion in the late 18th century.
1. The soldiers did not line up in a line. 2. It looks like the guy in the back gave them an order to fire, but he did not. 3. There was not as much blood as it looks like there was. I think there was a little bit more that was wrong without the engraving, but I'm not sure what.
$45
You are asking about the Boston Massacre, but the event was propaganda for the colonists who were wanting to show a cause for leaving the British crown. Paul Revere drew a handbill to spin the event into something much more than it really was. Most history books today show the drawing when writing about it. Other events between colonists and troops happened in other places, but you don’t read about them. One reason is that Boston was the center of anti British activists.
The Boston Massacre was one of many early events that happened in 1770. It was made into a propaganda paper with art by Paul Revere to stir up public opinions. The tea party was a group of smugglers throwing tea into Boston Harbor to protest the lowering of the tea tax making the smuggled Dutch tea higher in cost. It happened in 1773 resulting in the closing of the harbor. There were 3 years difference. They weren’t so much connected, but symbolic of the problems in the colonies and the king.
...Samuel Adams. He played up the Boston massacre so much that it turned anyone who wasn't already opposed to the British against them
1,000,000,000