answersLogoWhite

0

There would have been roughly 5,000 men of Legio X, (or any other legion) if it were at full strength. If under maned, as most legions were, the legion could have any number of men below the max of 5,000.

There would have been roughly 5,000 men of Legio X, (or any other legion) if it were at full strength. If under maned, as most legions were, the legion could have any number of men below the max of 5,000.

There would have been roughly 5,000 men of Legio X, (or any other legion) if it were at full strength. If under maned, as most legions were, the legion could have any number of men below the max of 5,000.

There would have been roughly 5,000 men of Legio X, (or any other legion) if it were at full strength. If under maned, as most legions were, the legion could have any number of men below the max of 5,000.

There would have been roughly 5,000 men of Legio X, (or any other legion) if it were at full strength. If under maned, as most legions were, the legion could have any number of men below the max of 5,000.

There would have been roughly 5,000 men of Legio X, (or any other legion) if it were at full strength. If under maned, as most legions were, the legion could have any number of men below the max of 5,000.

There would have been roughly 5,000 men of Legio X, (or any other legion) if it were at full strength. If under maned, as most legions were, the legion could have any number of men below the max of 5,000.

There would have been roughly 5,000 men of Legio X, (or any other legion) if it were at full strength. If under maned, as most legions were, the legion could have any number of men below the max of 5,000.

There would have been roughly 5,000 men of Legio X, (or any other legion) if it were at full strength. If under maned, as most legions were, the legion could have any number of men below the max of 5,000.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?