0
Chain of command for a legion: (Note: A legion was usually comprised of 10 Cohorts, each cohort was made of about 6 centuries, each century had 80 men plus the centurion)
Chain of Command:Legatus: Commander of the Legion, in charge of about 5,280 men.
Primus Pilus: Supreme Centurion of a Legion, Senior Centurion of the First Cohort, in charge of about 960 men.
Senior Centurion: Commander of a Cohort, in charge of about 480 men.
Primi Ordine: A Centurion in Command of a Century in the First Cohort, in charge of about 80 men.
Junior Centurion: Commander of a Century, in charge of about 80 men.
File Leader: Basically the leader of a file in a Century, not necessarily a Commander, but just a soldier who did have slight authority of about 10 men in a file.
What else can I help you with?
What is Roman centrion?
A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.
How many soldiers could a centurion command?
Most ancient remains pervail the knowledge that a Roman Centurion could control 100 men.His command would depend on his rank. There were many ranks of "centurion". The lowest ranking centurion commanded a century which was 80 men, contrary to popular belief that a century consisted of 100 men. If he commanded a cohort, he would command 480 men and if he were the "first spear" and commanded the first cohort, he had about 800 men under his command. The camp prefect, who was also a centurion, commanded the entire legion in the absence of the general and senior officers.
A roman soldier in charge of hundred men?
CENTURION
Roman officer in command of 100 soilders?
There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.
A roman commander of one hundred men is called?
A Centurion. 'Fraid not. There was no title for a man in command of 100. A centurion commanded 80. Centuries, or Centuriae, developed from the Roman Tribal system, these could be made up from 80 to 100 men. Later, under the Marian reforms this became the 100 men we know today.
What do you call a roman commander of one hundred men?
A centurion
What is a roman commander of 100 men called?
Sacajawea
A roman soldier with hundred men?
There isn't one really-a centurion had 83 men usually.
What cent word means a roman commander of 100 men?
a centurion
Which 9 letter word means a roman commander of men?
A centurion
What do you call a roman commander of hundred men?
A centurion
What was the leader of 100 roman soldiers called?
There was no Roman leader of 100 soldiers. There was an officer called a centurion, but he led 80 men, not 100. Don't be misled by the title.There was no Roman leader of 100 soldiers. There was an officer called a centurion, but he led 80 men, not 100. Don't be misled by the title.There was no Roman leader of 100 soldiers. There was an officer called a centurion, but he led 80 men, not 100. Don't be misled by the title.There was no Roman leader of 100 soldiers. There was an officer called a centurion, but he led 80 men, not 100. Don't be misled by the title.There was no Roman leader of 100 soldiers. There was an officer called a centurion, but he led 80 men, not 100. Don't be misled by the title.There was no Roman leader of 100 soldiers. There was an officer called a centurion, but he led 80 men, not 100. Don't be misled by the title.There was no Roman leader of 100 soldiers. There was an officer called a centurion, but he led 80 men, not 100. Don't be misled by the title.There was no Roman leader of 100 soldiers. There was an officer called a centurion, but he led 80 men, not 100. Don't be misled by the title.There was no Roman leader of 100 soldiers. There was an officer called a centurion, but he led 80 men, not 100. Don't be misled by the title.
