Three.
1
1
No, that is not true. A triumvirate is a political arrangement in which three individuals share power and authority, not four. The term historically refers to various political alliances, most notably in ancient Rome, where three leaders would govern together. In contrast, a government by four people with equal power would not be called a triumvirate.
Cleopatra was never in any triumvirate. First of all, triumvirate means "three men". A woman, even a queen would not fit in. Second, there were not three triumvirates, there were only two. Marc Antony was only in the second triumvirate.
A "Jewish" divorce would be governed by religious law.A "British" divorce would be governed by civil law.A "Jewish" divorce would be governed by religious law.A "British" divorce would be governed by civil law.A "Jewish" divorce would be governed by religious law.A "British" divorce would be governed by civil law.A "Jewish" divorce would be governed by religious law.A "British" divorce would be governed by civil law.
My guess would be Brutus...??
Julius Caesar was the member of the first triumvirate who wound up as the supreme ruler of Rome.Julius Caesar was the member of the first triumvirate who wound up as the supreme ruler of Rome.Julius Caesar was the member of the first triumvirate who wound up as the supreme ruler of Rome.Julius Caesar was the member of the first triumvirate who wound up as the supreme ruler of Rome.Julius Caesar was the member of the first triumvirate who wound up as the supreme ruler of Rome.Julius Caesar was the member of the first triumvirate who wound up as the supreme ruler of Rome.Julius Caesar was the member of the first triumvirate who wound up as the supreme ruler of Rome.Julius Caesar was the member of the first triumvirate who wound up as the supreme ruler of Rome.Julius Caesar was the member of the first triumvirate who wound up as the supreme ruler of Rome.
a direct democracy would be near impossible in a country with as many citizens as the U.S., which is why we are governed by a representative democracy.
Obama is in the consent of the governed.
The emperor ruled the country and was believed to be the Son of Heaven. However, he was only the Son of Heaven IF he had the Mandate of Heaven. The Mandate of Heaven was on the people's side. If the people liked the emperor, he had the Mandate of Heaven. If the people weren't pleased with the emperor, his Mandate of Heaven would be lost and the people would revolt. The emperor had a cabinet. Under him would be the governors and other large posts, followed by the small posts.
It depends on which people.
If you mean the magnetic poles, then none. The northern and southern poles of the Earth do not exist within the boundaries of any governed nations.