0
What else can I help you with?
How microprocessor works without internal memory?
Processors have internal memory-- In the form of the 3 L's. L1 Cache - Usually a very small amount, like 32-128kb, this is the fastest cache, and used to store very small strings of data for immediate use. L2 Cache - The heavy lifter of a processor-- Usually 1-2MB per core. This cache stores more complex values and helps with prioritization of workloads. L3 Cache - Relatively new in the processing world, L3 caches are larger, slower banks of memory in the upwards of 12-18MB used for basically anything not covered by the first 2 caches. If you mean internal memory as in RAM, a processor will not work without RAM.
How many gigabyts is 842mb plus 940mb plus 932mb plus 3.2gb plus 68mb plus 9.2mb plus 273mb plus 36.9mb plus 16mb plus 18mb plus 4992kb plus 6976kb plus 8864kb plus 19mb?
6.4 (6.374932) gigabytes.
How do I stop the constant interruptions when I stream from Netflix?
I have constant interruptions when streaming movies with Rocu (from all streaming suppliers). I have full bars wireless, 18mb fiber downloading speed and HDMI connection cable to Sony Brava HD tv. What the heck is wrong. Interruptions are reloading data based and make the experience horrible.
How many photos will 8gb hold on a 18mp camera?
Kinda depends, generally in my experience the size of a jpeg high res image directly from, say a canon t2i, is between 5.5 and 11mb, some as much as 16mb. An estimate therefore would be approximately 2979, 1489, and 1024 pics respectively. This however is only an estimate as each picture has different information which takes up more or less space than the previous picture even on the same device. Aditionally, it's unlikely that you would be using or keeping pictures in raw, but if you are, expect considerably less than that, on average canon raw files are around twice the size and generally save jpeg as well for menu images. So it would put that average number at around 750 or so pics, but most likely less.
How many MB are in a 2 minute video?
Impossible to say without knowing the aspect ratio, colour depth and frame rate. You also have to factor in the audio interleave, if any. As an example, an uncompressed hi-definition video with an aspect ratio of 1920 x 1080, 24 bits per pixel occupies 49,766,400 bits per frame. At 24 frames per second, that's 71,663,616,000 bits per minute. If the audio is uncompressed stereo with a sample rate of 41.1 KHz and 16 bits per channel, that will consume 1,315,200 bits per second which is 78,912,000 bits per minute. So 1 minute of uncompressed audio and video will consume a total 71,742,528,000 bits which is 8,967,816,000 bytes, approximately 8,552.37 megabytes (8.35 gigabytes). MPEG compression makes the calculation much more difficult because MPEG uses variable rate compression. Thus the storage requirement will vary from one minute to the next.
How do you get to set up your desktop system to have a total hard drives space of 150 gb but your system does not support drives larger than 132 gb what should i do?
You need to provide more information. However assuming Win XP: SP2 supports larger drives. However, prior to SP2, as in my case, I too was limited by the 132MB limit. First, there is no reason not to install SP2; it adds security, and a decent firewall. But if you don't have SP2 and want to fix this, you need to create two partitions, one the maximum 132MB, and one for the rest of the space. Then, using the drive manager snap-in, you can merge the two partitions into one. It's not really intuitive and kind of a hassle, but will allow access to the full drive. Assuming you DO have XP SP2, or Linux, then you need to verify your BIOS supports 48 bit LBA addressing. For older computers, you will probably be stuck with the 132MB limit per partition. Often, the BIOS can be updated to support larger drives. Regardless of your system limits, you should always be able to use the full 150MB simply by creating two partitions after which, I would use the smaller one (18MB) for the OS, and make it the FIRST partition which is the fastest area of the HDD. Actually, making the first partition larger would be wise, perhaps 50MB. Then make the second one 100MB, or split the 100MB into smaller partitions. An advantage of this is it allows less fragmentation, and faster defragmentation. You could also create a partition for data backup as any crash will only affect partitions in use, while the backup partition will generally not be in use and safe from corruption and allow restoration of any data lost or offloaded. There are several ways to set up a HDD. For instance, you can create several partitions sized according to the usage. I suggest (for Windows NT5+, i.e. Win2k and XP) creating two or three partitions, or four if you want to run multiple operating systems. In my case, I have five partitions, the first, a smaller one, is used for temporary files and the paging file, and is the fastest. Second, the OS, Win XP which then needs to be told to use the first partition for the temp and paging files. The third is reserved for another OS, Linux in my case. and the fourth, and largest, is for applications and the fifth, for files rarely used such as install files, and video or other media. This layout assumes that applications, once loaded, won't need much HDD access, while Windows will be constantly using the page file and temp files and the higher speed of the first partition will speed up the overall system. My third partition, reserved for Linux, is a compromise and as the non-main OS, doesn't need the raw speed of the first partitions, yet allows keeping it isolated and independent from Windows. Some people refute this type of setup but actual speed testing shows almost a 2 to 1 speed advantage of the first (outer tracks of the drive) vs, the last (inner tracks of the drive). This is due to the fact that the HDD operates at a constant angular velocity or RPM, regardless of where the data is being accessed from. This simple fact means that because the outer edge of the platter is physically longer (circumfrence) and thus holds more data with larger sectors, is read at the same rate that the platter rotates while the innermost tracks are much smaller and hold much less data also being read at the same rate as the platter spins. So larger tracks read more data per revolution and inherently is faster. Some lower performance drives might behave differently and have a more consistent data speed, but in general, the first, outer partition will have the highest performance, a fact that can be used to advantage depending on your usage needs of the drive.
