A question that cannot be answered. It may be that attacks have not been carried out because there was airport security and the attackers decided not to do so for fear of getting caught. These are obviously numbers we will never know.
In response to the first answer:Clearly such a question could not be answered so why assume that is what I meant?I can't seem to edit the question so to state the obvious -As a matter of record, how many people have been apprehended by airport security attempting to board airplanes?
Your amendment is quite good enough. I have been looking for the same information and can't find any potential terrorists apprehended at security checks. Even in the few arrests at airports that I have found are all the result of intelligence alerting security staff, not the checks themselves.
In fact, some of the the checks are the RESULT of failures of security checks - shoes, shoe laces, belts, 100ml max fluids - which are all a result of successful penetration of security after the checks.
None of them.
the terrorist attack because they were mad at the homeland security...
Homeland Security Clowns.
The Department of Homeland Security.
The Department of Homeland Security
yes because if there where terrorist attacks that should of warned them to put their guards up at all times and have more security in the airports.
There have been many terrorist attacks such as the September 11th attacks and the 67 terrorist attacks on Pakistan,The Mumbai attacks and many more
Department of Homeland Security
Damascus terrorist attacks happened in 2008.
Office of Homeland Security
They will think we are afraid and make more terrorist attacks and threats. Mostly has to do with homeland security.
The Department of Homeland Security
32 a year there is a lot of terrorist there. So if you go there be sure to be careful at the airport. You never know.