How many scientific theories are needed to establish scientific fact?

science is never a fact its only Theories

bc scientific theories are hypotheses tested enough to be supported by evidence, and a fact is a proven thing. scientific theories are only right until theyre proven wrong ...

scientist required proof before accepting theories as fact NOVANET

No, theories are reasonably well proved scientific conclusions and usually treated as fact. ...

A scientific theory is a theory, no given proof of being a fact, a scientific law is what always happens, essentially a fact. Both is in chemistry and physics. The theory of gravitation happens before it became the Law of gravitation. Scientific theories and laws are similar except laws were proven to be recognize as a fact. ...

A scientific theory is something that is tried and tested, and not yet disproven. It is close to being scientific 'fact' as you can get. Not all hypotheses will become theories because sometimes they get disproven. That means the hypothesis will need to be changed and tested again. ...

They do the experiment again, double check all their calculations, then they come up with a new theory if it's necessary. That's why there's no such thing as a scientific fact, only scientific theories. ...

A scientific law is an indisputable fact: there are no observances dictating it. For example, gravity is a scientific law. A scientific theory is simply a generally accepted explanation for a particular phenomenon or idea that cannot currently be proven or disproven. The structure of the atom and evolution are theories. ...

A scientific theory is a highly supported and very well tested explanation for an observed pattern of known scientific facts. For example, the theory of gravity is used to explain the observable pattern of unsuspended objects falling towards the Earth. ...

a scientific fact is called data.

The Origin of Species, as outlined by Charles Darwin, went against many scientific peoples' opinions and theories accepted as fact at the time. ...

By not being so much based on fact as explaining said facts. That is what scientific theories do, explain the facts and laws contained within them as far as possible. For example; evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains much, not everything, about the fact of evolution. ...

To be a fact the theoretical methods used must be replicatable with the same results. Scientific theories can be rejected by new reliable evidence. They Can Change Over Time As a theory, it is unproven. For a scientific theory to deserve that name, it can of course not just be idle speculation. There must a strong suggestion that the claim of the theory is true, but a formal and sound proof has not yet been found. ...

Theories are changed constantly. In fact, many known theories today are only theories from that of someone else only with an improvement. Many scientific theories for example are developed that way. Take this for example, many thought the world was flat, that theory developed (changed) to the fact that the world is round instead of flat. Current theories that are changing daily-- "How was the universe formed?" "How did life begin"? "Was there ever life on Mars"? "What is all that DNA for?" "How do we...

No. Theories are explanations of facts. For instance; evolution is a fact. Allele frequencies change over time in a population of organisms. This is observed and observable. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains how and why evolution happens. Some theories are so well supported that some people blur the line between theory and fact, but best to be precise in these matters I think. ...

Due to the fact that he studied under Plato, he based his theories and philosophies from the reactions of his teacher's theories. ...

There is no absolute knowledge in science that can never be disproven even in principle. It does sometimes turn out that scientists are wrong, and what they considered to be a fact turns out not to be one. I would add that it is more usual for scientists to revise theories, than to reject what was considered to be a fact, but it does happen. ...

A scientific fact is a fact surely constated by a great number of repeated experiments and having a theoretical explanation. ...

Theories are guesses that scientists make but aren't actually 100% accurate but scientist believe them.Fact is something that scientists have proven that it is 100% true. ...

Good question! A scientific theory is, basically, a set of propositions, facts, or principles which are used to try and explain a specific phenomenon or a series of related phenomena. As such, scientific theories are just that, theories, so they can be wrong and can be replaced by other, better theories. A law, however, dictates a scientific "fact" which is always true according to what the law dictates. An example could be the law of the conservation of energy, according to which energy...

# A scientific fact must be observable. # A scientific fact must be repeatable. # A scientific fact must be measurable (in some way). # Any scientific measurement must have credible errors recorded. ...

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. ...

That is study that claims to be scientific, but is in fact not.

scientific fact or scientific law

Scientific is a fact experimentally validated and theoretically explained. ...