Want this question answered?
In a parliamentary democracy, a majority government is one in which the ruling party has a majority of the seats in parliament. In contrast, a coalition government is one in which two or more parties combine to have a majority of the seats, and thus form a government. A minority government is one in which no party or coalition has a majority of the seats, but the largest party forms a government anyway. Minority governments are very unstable, and generally do not last very long.
When no political party has the required majority of seats to form a government, such a situation is called hung assembly.
Officially they are invited to form a government by the monarch. In reality the leader of the party with a majority of seats in the house brcomes the primemiister
After the elections, the party or coalition of parties that have the majority of seats in the Legislative Assembly form government. The leader of the party becomes the premier and the cabinet is selected.
Each Member of Parliament holds a single seat. Canada doesn't have a position called "majority leader". The equivalent position in Canada is Leader of the Government. Like in the US House of Representatives, the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons is not truly the leader of their party, that being the Prime Minister (as opposed to the Speaker of the House as is the case in the US). For a party to form a majority government, it must have over half the seats in the House of Commons. Currently, this means at least 155 members. The current government (as of March, 2011) is a minority government, with 143 seats.
172 seats are required to form a GOV
Via a referendum demonstrating a clear majority (as specified by the UK Government), with independence granted by the UK government. The current local government (dominated by the children and grandchildren of West Indian immigrants, unfriendly to Britain) has attempted, in light of the unlikeliness of obtaining such a referendum, to have the rules amended so that its winning the sufficient majority of seats in the local assembly required to form the government be considered as sufficient endorsement of its goal of independence, but this attempt to circumnavigate the electorate caused outrage in Bermuda, and has not been allowed by the UK government.
296
no-one!
India's election resulted in a setback for the ruling partyled by President Singh. As a result his government had to form more of a coalition with with other parties, to hold power. His majority was either reduced to just below a majority or barely held a majority, but either way he had to form relationships (coalitions) with other parties to hold power.
It depends on the monarchy, but assuming a democracy, the monarch invites the leader of the winning party to form a government - so although, in principle, the monarch could pick anyone, in practise they pick the person who can command a majority of seats in the government.
The key word is Majority According to the elections results, check the main powers in Parliament. The parties have the largest number of seats. According to these parties arrangement, you can define th minimum number of parties your government need to include to get the Parliament acceptance on your government formation. Of course the number of seats isn't the only factor here. The largest number of seats can go to the most opponent party to yours. Sometimes you will need the small parties. Sometimes the small parties play the key roll of forming the majority