As many as they wanted, as long as they had enough.
yes, he was he owned slaves.
The slave master and overseers
Slaves did anything their masters wanted them to do from giving them a foot rub to going to plow the fields. Anything the slave master wanted.
they either buried he or she and got a new slave or if they die on the slave ship they get thrown in the water.
The underground Railroad.
TBH, I think that slaves gain their master's because they get whipped and slapped if they don't do what they are asked by the master. I mean, a master might bribe the slave into believing and trusting him/her.
Branded slaves are slaves that have had a red hot piece of metal stamped into their skin to symbolize that they are a certain persons slave or if the slave gets away he/she could be returned to their Master.
Slaves may or may not have been allowed to marry by their masters.One thing to realize is slaves were their master's property and if the master chose to he could breed his slaves as he did his other living property (e.g. animals, plants). This would not involve marriage and whether or not the slave was already "married", that slave would have to have sex with whomever the master chose to breed them with (which may be either slave or free).
A slave owner can have as many slaves as they can afford to buy and support.
There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".
The slave master typically referred to the slave as "slave" or by their given name. However, it is important to note that slaves were often dehumanized and derogatory terms were used to degrade and demean them.
Many slaves were granted their freedom when their master died as a provision in his will. I believe a slave could also buy his freedom. They were usually freed when they were around 30 (manumission) Also when their master was very pleased and very kind he would set him free. eg. if you were a kind master and you were being mugged, and a slave saves you, you might free that slave. Question of my own: How would a master show that he freed his slave??