Hitler had a highly modern military. It had several relatively recent military inovations, including advanced tanks, aircraft, and then revolutionary rockets.
Blitzkrieg, the assault on massive amounts of lands
Hitler didn't have childen of his own.
machine guns,mustard gas,aircraft of any kind,oh and tanks just to think of a few
labor and concentration camps
Here are some websites that will help you: http://www.suite101.com/content/world-war-1-and-hitler-a49718 http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/warone.htm http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/adolf-hitler.htm http://www.remember.org/guide/Facts.root.hitler.html I hope these help you!
I don't think Hitler invented any kind of gas. I might be wrong so don't rely on my answer.
Blitzkrieg, the assault on massive amounts of lands
A dictatorship
A fascist dictatorship
The Russian Czar was a poor leader during World War 1. He had no military experience and was unable to relate to the people or to the troops when he reviewed them.
Adolf hitler wasn't a government!! But his goverment was a military rule or dictatory form?? this means that he was the sole person who had all the rights and no one could oppose his rule. Just the opposite of democracy.. Hope you understand..
You mean military allies? It depends on the specific situation, but it is very unlikely. The only time when Mexico and the US had such kind of alliance was during World War Two.
Hitler influences people in many ways, To most the influence is that to not be like him and to never anyone to be a "Adolf Hitler". However, Hitler has influenced 10,000s to 100,000s of people in making attempeds to restore the Nazi Party and to carrying on Hitler's and the Nazi ideology. Also in the middle, Hitler does influence the kind of capability Human beings actually have and many psychologists do try to understand the criminal mind to guess how Hitler mind had work. Not all pyschologist do this, only a handful actually do this.
the nazi
It's kind of a silly question, but let's take a look. Stalin was short (he was only 5'4"), about 10 years older than Hitler, and had permanently injured his left arm when he was a kid. Because of his injured arm, he was unable to join the Russian military during World War I, so he had no formal military training; when he later served as a general in the Soviet army, he was pretty bad at it. So he's already at a bit of a disadvantage. When Stalin got older, he drank and smoked heavily, which further weakened his body, and actually wound up being the cause of his death in 1953. Hitler was considerably taller than Stalin (5'9"), served in the German Army during World War I and even earned a few medals for valor. He famously was a vegetarian, and also didn't drink or smoke, so he was probably in fairly good physical condition for most of his adult life. However, as he aged and World War II dragged on, he appears to have heavily abused drugs and may have even had Parkinson's disease. Hitler died when he committed suicide in 1945 in order to avoid being captured by the Soviet Red Army. It seems, based on the above, that in a hypothetical one-on-one fist fight between Stalin and Hitler, Hitler would have the advantage. He was younger, bigger, had military training/experience, and was in better shape.
Kind of.... If it wasn't for Hitler there wouldn't be a World War II....
Hitler didn't have childen of his own.