As with all questions of this nature it is the responsibility of the asker to provide some criteria for the evaluator to make a comparison upon. For example: are humans better at Chess than vampires are?
The answer to this is No, most vampires that manage to perpetuate their existence are better at chess than the earth's population at large. This is because it isn't easy being a vampire and some degree of craftiness is required for the vampire to continue its existence amid a homicidally hostile human population. This craftiness is reflected in the vampires ability to play games of logic such as chess.
Humans are real and vampires aren't. Boom. End of story.
NO. David Copperfield is no vampire.
Vampires are often depicted as super-smart with intelligence higher than humans.
Magic powers. Vampires are boring, they are just the same as humans only they drink blood.
Vampires are more pale than regular human beings. They have abnormal eye color & speak from a different time. they also have freakishly ice cold skin, when humans have normal body temperature. Vampires are just different in many ways than humans.
I would choose Vampires because they are cooler than Bigfoot.
heres a list of a vampires special skills- -they can grow fangs -turn into bat -have extra strong energy power than humans -can track down humans from there blood smell -speed is extra faster than humans
yes , vampires live between humans
Alice's gift in Twilight is to see into the future, but she can only see things when a decision has been made. She can see vampires better than humans.
* Vampires do not age : Humans do * Vampires drink blood : Humans don't * Vampires can live for ever and cannot be harmed Vampires are fictitious. Humans write fiction.
Vampires do not co-exist with humans peacefully because vampires do not exist, period.
Vampires are supposed to have many abilities and properties that humans do not, but the major one is that vampires have no proof of existence.