answersLogoWhite

0

There has been no official count of the beheadings under the emperors.

There has been no official count of the beheadings under the emperors.

There has been no official count of the beheadings under the emperors.

There has been no official count of the beheadings under the emperors.

There has been no official count of the beheadings under the emperors.

There has been no official count of the beheadings under the emperors.

There has been no official count of the beheadings under the emperors.

There has been no official count of the beheadings under the emperors.

There has been no official count of the beheadings under the emperors.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is a roman soldier and emperor?

A Roman soldier is someone who fights in the army. An emperor is the head of state. May Roman emperors were military men before their careers as emperors, and men such as Trajan were also engaged in wars while ruling.


Who are the Roman persecutors?

The term may apply to the Roman emperors that initiated and promoted the persecution of Christians such as Nero, Trajan, Severus, Valerian and Diocletian. It can also refer to the soldiers, jailers and torturers who carried out orders from the emperors .


What was the final Jeopardy category on May 18 2010?

The Final Jeopardy category for May 18 2010 was Roman Emperors


What did Roman senators do for the emperor?

By the time of the emperors, the senate had very little power. Their main duties were to pass honorary resolutions, confirm any laws or decisions the emperor may want and to confirm new emperors.


What did Roman emprers look like?

Roman emperors have no set physical appearance. You may as well ask "what do the presidents of the United States look like?". The emperors, as well as the presidents, follow their family's genes as far as appearance goes.Roman emperors have no set physical appearance. You may as well ask "what do the presidents of the United States look like?". The emperors, as well as the presidents, follow their family's genes as far as appearance goes.Roman emperors have no set physical appearance. You may as well ask "what do the presidents of the United States look like?". The emperors, as well as the presidents, follow their family's genes as far as appearance goes.Roman emperors have no set physical appearance. You may as well ask "what do the presidents of the United States look like?". The emperors, as well as the presidents, follow their family's genes as far as appearance goes.Roman emperors have no set physical appearance. You may as well ask "what do the presidents of the United States look like?". The emperors, as well as the presidents, follow their family's genes as far as appearance goes.Roman emperors have no set physical appearance. You may as well ask "what do the presidents of the United States look like?". The emperors, as well as the presidents, follow their family's genes as far as appearance goes.Roman emperors have no set physical appearance. You may as well ask "what do the presidents of the United States look like?". The emperors, as well as the presidents, follow their family's genes as far as appearance goes.Roman emperors have no set physical appearance. You may as well ask "what do the presidents of the United States look like?". The emperors, as well as the presidents, follow their family's genes as far as appearance goes.Roman emperors have no set physical appearance. You may as well ask "what do the presidents of the United States look like?". The emperors, as well as the presidents, follow their family's genes as far as appearance goes.


Why do Islams cut their heads?

Very few Muslims behead people. If there are professed Muslims who behead people then it is not their religion that makes them do so, thought, like Hitler, they may claim they were divinely inspired. This question is essentially null as beheading is not an Islamic practice.


How many roman emperors visited Britain?

Only three Roman emperors are known to have visited Britain: Julius Caesar, who conducted military campaigns in 55 and 54 BC; Claudius, who invaded and officially annexed Britain in AD 43; and Septimius Severus, who visited the province in the early 3rd century AD. While other emperors may have had an influence on Britain through legislation or military actions, these three are the only ones recorded to have set foot there.


Names of Roman emporers?

if you want the names of the Roman emperors the list is endless. During the period between 27 BC and 395 AD there were 146 emperors. In 395 the western and eastern parts of the empire became separated. The western part lasted until 476 and had 23 more emperors. The eastern part lasted until 1453 and had 94 more emperors. If you want the name of the title of the emperors it was Augustus. After 641 the title of the Empeors of the Easter Roman Empire (which had also been called Byzantine Empire by historians, but not by the Romans) was basileus.


How many roman emperors ruled during the 50 year period covered by this chart how many died a natural death what was the most frequent cause of death of these men?

To accurately answer your question, I would need to see the specific chart you're referencing regarding Roman emperors. However, in general, during any given 50-year period of Roman history, several emperors may have ruled, with some dying of natural causes and others from assassination or other violent means. The most frequent causes of death among emperors often included assassination, but natural causes like illness or old age were also common. If you provide more details or context from the chart, I can give a more precise answer.


Which people in the world are always in a hurry?

Anyone who is Russian. Some people are Roman, but they may not be in a hurry. ----------------- New Yorkers!


Why were the Roman officials unhappy with Christianity?

In short, Roman officials (and others) were unhappy with Christianity for 1:reasons that many governments dislike Christianity and 2:reasons unique to the Roman empire. 1: Many governments fear religious movements because they are worried it will unite a group of people against their power. Often, dictators or repressive states fear and dislike Christianity because it may disagree with their principles and give a large demographic of people cause to resist them. 2: The Romans already disliked the Jews for similar reasons: the Jews refused to take part in Roman culture (sacrifice to idols, eating certain foods, sexual immorality, worship of many gods). The Roman emperors also began to add themselves to the pantheon of Roman gods. They claimed to be gods and desired to be worshiped. For Jews (and Christians) this was blasphemy against God. The Christians felt the Roman emperors were not God's son, but Jesus was. This refusal to line up with Roman customs and to obey the order to worship the Emperor made the Christians unpopular. In one instance, a Roman emperor wrote that he feared the Christians and arrested them because he was sure they were committing secret crimes but found them only reciting scripture and taking oaths not to break their marriages. Lastly, the Christians were easy to blame. Nero was reputed to have blamed them for many problems to take pressure off of himself. The Christians were at times forgotten about, but when convenient, emperors like Domitian would start persecuting them again and blaming them for Roman troubles.


What was the period of bad ramon emperors?

There was not a period of bad Roman emperors. There was a period of good emperors. The term the 'five good emperors' was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He said that these emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81)) Nerva (ruled 96-98 AD), Trajan (ruled 98-117), Hadrian (ruled 117-138), Antoninus Pius (ruled 138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (ruled 161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors because these men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor) and he thought that this was why they were good rulers. They were good rulers, lived good lives and earned the goodwill of the people. Machiavelli also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started and the ruin of the empire commenced. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad. All were good who succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' This is a bit on an extreme view as there were also good emperors after the "five good emperors." Still, the bad rule of Commodus (who succeeded Marcus Aurelius) led to the end of the period of relative political stability in the empire which historians have called Pax Romana (roman peace). The famous historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."