answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How might decide whether a given substance is a mineral?

how might you decide whether a given substance is a mineral


How might you decide whether a given substance is mineral?

how might you decide whether a given substance is a mineral


How might you decide whether given substance is mineral?

how might you decide whether a given substance is a mineral


What could happen if a scientist does not conduct a controlled variable?

you might not get the experiment correct (:


Why do scientist replicate other scientist experiment?

They might just want to retest ,but there are other reasons not everyone could be sure of that.


When a scientist makes an educated guess about what the right answer to a science experiment might be?

This is called a hypothesis.


Why might a mixture weigh less after a new substance is added?

Some of the substance may be boiled off into the air (depending on the experiment) and cannot be weighed after the experiment is finished.


Why might a scientist use stimulation in a controlled experiment?

The reason they would is because it is a lot safer.


Why might scientist repeat an experiment?

Scientists repeat their experiments because to make sure that their results are correct.


Why might a scientist use simulation in a controlled experiment?

to observe a 1000year process in just one day


How do scientist?

He or she states the problemThe scientist forms a hypothesis, a possible solution to the problem. The simplest solution is often the best solution.Next, a scientist might want to perform a controlled experiment. A controlled experiment can give a scientist more information about his or hers hypothesis.Results are recorded and analyzed.Using the data the scientist can develop a conclusion.


Why do scientist repeat the examples of other scientist?

There are various reasons. Here are some:They might be skeptical of the reliability or truth of what other scientists have claimed.They might be trying to understand the earlier results better.They might be hoping to extend the other scientist's results.They might be trying to determine whether there are limits to the applicability of the other scientist's results.