it is because of the black death
Because,the people might try to stop it when it comes to to them.
They didn't. They thought that if they punished themselves enough, God might take the Plague away, but of course, it didn't work.
It is a silent death.
My guess would be servants taking food to them ect. Who had the plague themselves and just didn't know it yet. Also it might have been in the food which might have come from a sick cook.
Neuroticism, extroversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness would be five factors that might influence the outcome of a personality assessment.
There is no specific collective noun for plagues, there is seldom more than a single plague active at a time. A collective noun that might be applicable is a series of plagues. The noun 'plague' is a collective noun used to group things that are harmful and have become too common (a plague of violence, a plague of accidents); or things that have become too great in number, seemingly our to control (a plague of locusts, a plague of rats).
They wont be affected
In the 14th century (during the bubonic plague) people drunk their own urine twice a day
Black Death Plague was result of trade. So it destroyed trade, thus city.
Treatments won't prevent the Plague, but good housekeeping practices might (such as keeping mice and rodents out of the house and avoiding breathing the dust from their droppings). After contracting the Plague, it can be treated with antibiotics.
Joshua Lawrence Chamberlin affected the outcome of the civil war by holding control of little round top in the battle of Gettysburg even though he ran out of ammo, he led a charge forcing most of the confederates charging up little round top to surrender to his division. If Chamberlin did surrender, the confederates would have had control of the high ground, and possibly winning the batte of Gettysburg, wich might have won the Confederates the war
independent variable