Yes as well as slaves.
Slaves cost much less: to buy and to care for than indentured servants.
Yes. New Jersey was on the south.Yes.
Early on, there was a steady stream of white, indentured servants coming from England to the New World. Many were promised land after completing their services and were therefore eager to work. The main reason colonial masters opted for this option was because these indentured servants were much cheaper than African and Indian slaves. After Bacon's rebellion however, and after an economic upturn in England which kept laborers home, indentured servants became a less desirable option. At this point, the slave trade had opened up and indentured servants were seen as too difficult to control.
There were very few slaves during the colonial period in British North America. Indentured servants, on the other hand, were much more common. The employers that indentured servants worked for grew financially stable, and they increased the price of labor over time, which made it difficult for servants to pay off their debt. Slavery became favored for the potential financial increases slaves produced through hard labor work. Eventually, though, the north and south states developed opposite opinions on the necessity of slaves.
Indentured servants were individuals who exchanged a set period of labor for passage to the American colonies. They played a crucial role in the early development of the colonies by providing much-needed labor for tasks such as farming and housework. Despite their contributions, many indentured servants faced harsh working conditions and limited rights.
Slaves formed families and had children.
The indentured servants were bought by their masters. The master saw them not as people, but as animals. The indentured servants could not do much without the permission of there masters.
Indentured servants were free, but at the same time they were like slaves, but treated much better. Indentured servants are people wh agree to work for a person for a certain amount of years for pay if the person will bring them to america. They were free becausethey chose to work for the people, and they weren't kidnapped, but they were almost like slaves because when they finished the agreed years, the master would say tey have to pay them for the shelter, clothes, and food they had while they stayed, which in the end made them work longer.
There were large land owners, Planters/farmers, women who were pretty much homemakers, indentured servants, slaves, and artisans/craftsman.
One group of servants who sold their labor for passage were indentured servants. These individuals would enter into a contract, typically lasting for a set number of years, in which they would work for a person or company in exchange for transportation to a new country. Once their contract period was completed, they would be free to establish their own lives and typically received some form of compensation or land.
Slaves and indentured servants allowed Southern plantation and farm owners to maximize the profits from sale of their crops by eliminating the need to pay wages to their workers. Indentured servants were much more popular in the North, however, as many of them were poor, skilled whites who emigrated from Europe and agreed to enter a limited servitude in order to pay off the cost of their crossing. Southerners were disinclined to take this option, as the servants would eventually need to be freed, and most of them even earned a small wage.
No. Slaves were property.They were not the same. Indentured servants were to serve 7 years, but often they left before they finished their time. They could blend in so it made it hard to find them, but any person who was black was a slave and needed a pass to leave the plantation. Indentured servants were paid and free after 7 years. Slaves were never paid and were considered property.