around £3.7 billion
The cost of power per Kwh from nuclear plants is now reckoned to be similar to fossil fuelled plants. The makeup of the costs is different however. Fossil fuelled plants are cheaper to build, but the fuel costs are higher, so it is always a difficult one for a power company to decide. See the link below.
Yes, you have to grow the plants, or collect the garbage, and there are maintenance costs for the power station, which can be the same as a fossil fuel (coal, oil and natural gas) power station, but without causing global warming.
Levelized cost of kwh from a nuclear power plant is cheaper than from any fossil fueled power plants.
The cost of solar power has been decreasing and is now often cheaper than fossil fuels in many regions.
No. A nuclear power station is a massive undertaking, and is cost effective only on the large scale.
Solar power only requires initial investment. The cost of setting up solar panels is high, but after that, the cost of maintenance is negligible.
i asked this question so why dont you answer it
billions of dollars
Nuclear energy can provide cost savings by producing lower-cost electricity compared to other energy sources. This can lead to lower electricity bills for consumers. Additionally, nuclear energy can help reduce reliance on volatile fossil fuel prices, which can also contribute to cost savings for consumers.
its actually fifty million moolah
165 million dollars
to help pay for line maintenance, employees, and cost of fuel.