around £3.7 billion
The cost of power per Kwh from nuclear plants is now reckoned to be similar to fossil fuelled plants. The makeup of the costs is different however. Fossil fuelled plants are cheaper to build, but the fuel costs are higher, so it is always a difficult one for a power company to decide. See the link below.
Yes, you have to grow the plants, or collect the garbage, and there are maintenance costs for the power station, which can be the same as a fossil fuel (coal, oil and natural gas) power station, but without causing global warming.
Figures published on website www.world-nuclear.org show that the projected overall cost of electric power from nuclear plants is similar to that from fossil fuelled plants (coal or natural gas). Nuclear plants cost more to build but the fuel costs are lower, so they need to be run at full power whenever possible.
Levelized cost of kwh from a nuclear power plant is cheaper than from any fossil fueled power plants.
Nuclear plants are expensive to build but cheaper to run than fossil fuelled plants. Overall the cost delivered to consumers is much the same
No. A nuclear power station is a massive undertaking, and is cost effective only on the large scale.
Solar power only requires initial investment. The cost of setting up solar panels is high, but after that, the cost of maintenance is negligible.
billions of dollars
i asked this question so why dont you answer it
its actually fifty million moolah
165 million dollars
to help pay for line maintenance, employees, and cost of fuel.