Time would proceed at its "normal" baseline rate. The presence of any gravitational field slows time from this rate.
no,
it makes all the eroded stuff deposit at the bottom, if there wasnt any gravity stuff would jut erode into the wind and turn into tiny terror plants that would blow around erode the rest of are planet, silly
Honestly I don't have any facts to back this up. but I believe that snails travel faster downhill due to the fact that gravity is assisting them. Considering the method of which they travel ( by sliding over slime ) I would think you could move faster downhill as you would not have to push against gravity to move up.
a controlled experiment must have only one manipulated variable becuase if the experiment had multiple manipulated variables then it would not be a controlled experiment anymore it would be a manipulated Deseret experiment
There would be traffic circles everywhere! I believe traffic would actually move a little faster during rush our with this. The east coast is full of traffic circles.
When the earth rotates 30 time faster every thing will get burnt due to friction with the air if not then i dont know...............
it depends on a lot of factors but i would say downwards because you are working with gravity not against it.
NO!!! if you know what manipulated means, you would know it is not an alternative to said.
The manipulated variable goes on the horizontal axis.
Yes, you would be able to run faster on Mars compared to Earth because the gravity on Mars is about 38% of Earth's gravity. This means there is less gravitational force pulling you down, allowing you to move more easily.
No, it would hit slower because gravity on the moon is 1/6 the gravity on earth.
Yes, in theory, you would run faster in less gravity because there is less force pulling you down, allowing you to move more freely and with less resistance. However, other factors such as air resistance and muscle strength would also play a role in determining your overall speed.