Want this question answered?
The Suez Canal allowed for a direct link to Asia through Europe without having to go around Africa. This made trade much quicker and easier.
A will
A boat's shape is usually more streamlines on the bottom, the faster the boat the more streamlined it will be, this allows the vessel to cut through the water much like a knife.
2 billion
no charge for pleasure craft
In 1975, it took 5 weeks to do the trip in the opposite direction, i.e. Sydney to Southampton, UK; It probably has not changed much since then. It took 6 weeks in 1966 to come through the Panama Canal via Tahiti and New Zealand, but faster ships were doing the voyage through the Suez Canal to Australia in about 4 weeks.
The world did not laterally get smaller- if that is your ? The Suez canal made it much faster to ship goods and people around the globe .
The African
14.16 on a big boat
The Suez Canal is the only way to get from the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean without having to travel all the way around Africa. The Suez Canal is also under the ownership of the Suez Canal Authority which is an Eqyption holding. Ships must pay to use the canal, like a toll road, otherwise they would have to pay much more to traverse the much greater distance to go around Africa.
It depends on the speed of the vessel and the course plotted, so I can't answer your question, but the shortest route is around India, into the Red Sea, through the Suez canal, west through the Mediterranean, through the Straits of Gibraltar, around Portugal northeast to England. It is much shorter than going around the Cape. When the remainder of the Arctic Ice Pack melts, a shorter route by about half would be through the Berring Strait, cross the North Pole, past the Netherlands to England. See, global warming is not necessarily a bad thing.
40 miles