on it's own It's between 99p and £1.50 something like that, but the meal is more expensive
That depends what is in the sandwich. A PB&J can sit out much longer than a tuna fish salad sandwich (which shouldn't sit out much at all - make and eat).
It varies from location to location.
it is the arugittybooditty of the fish stick sandwich while a great golden retriever man bear pig is eating the sandwich under cover from fire of the Iraqy army while he is still eating this amazing fish stick sandwich while undercover from the Iraqy army while skating in a skate rink while eating this amazing fish stick sandwich while undercover from the Iraqy army while skating and doing much much much more stuff while eating this AMAZING fish stick sandwich while undercover from the Iraqy army while skating in a skating rink
The Fish Filet Sandwich is made with a piece of fish with a melted half slice of cheese and tartar sauce on a steamed bun/
It has over 250 calories not healthy for you. Eat better with Burger King
McDonald's uses wild-caught Alaskan pollock for their Filet-O-Fish sandwich. The fish is breaded and fried before being served on a bun with tartar sauce.
Well if you manage to somehow get a jelly fish into a sandwich then just simply stick the stick into the sandwich, although i'm pretty sure a human will not enjoy this sandwich
I would say a cheese sandwich is healthier, but that is just my opinion
cheese
No.
A sandwich would only be protected by copyright if it were literally a work of art. You may trademark a sandwich (the Filet o' Fish, for example, is a registered trademark), but this can be expensive. There are also a few sandwich patents, such as the "sealed crustless sandwich" known as Uncrustables.
In my experience, a tuna fish sandwich can survive for some hours without refrigeration - you can take one to school with you in your lunchbox - but for any longer period of time, yes, it would need refrigeration.