Antimatter is a concept.
It is also particles composed negatively.
Anti matter isn't created, but "formed". No one can create matter (or anti-matter) nor destroy it.
They aren't 3 they are in fact 12 if you count anti matter as a separate particle from matter. Electron, muon, tau, electron neutrino, muon neutrino and tau neutrino. The same apply to anti matter positron, anti muon, anti tau, postrin neutrino, anti muon neutrino, and anti tau neutrino.
The resulting photon release would vary depending on method of annihilation and/or if said anti matter was in concurrence, at that time, with matter.
Black holes consist of matter, not anti-matter. They are formed from the super-nova of stars that consist of matter.
Not as such, no. Antimatter is just matter that is charged backwards from what we think of as "normal" matter. it can be a solid, liquid, gas or plasma just like normal matter. the only difference is that antimatter uses positrons and anti-protons instead of electrons and protons to create an atom.
Anti matter isn't created, but "formed". No one can create matter (or anti-matter) nor destroy it.
jellyfishes are not a matter of money.
It matter
Probably the same as a fistful of normal matter. Note that just like normal matter comes in different varieties, so could antimatter, in principle - that is, you could have anti-hydrogen, anti-water, anti-lead, etc. So, I would expect a fistful of anti-lead to weigh as much as a fistful of normal lead, a fistful of anti-lithium to weigh as much as a fistful of normal lithium, etc.
One of the unsolved questions about our Universe is why it is composed almost entirely of matter. In our understanding of our Universe, the ratio of matter to anti-matter should be about 50-50. Saying, "All the anti-matter went into the super-massive black holes (smbh) at the center of galaxies" doesn't solve very much. It just leads to the question, "Why did only anti-matter go into smbh, and not matter?" There is SOMETHING about our Universe that favors matter over anti-matter. We just don't yet know what that something is. Simply saying that it is something that makes anti-matter, but not matter, go into smbh doesn't really solve much.
A vacuum consist of anti-matter; the opposite of matter...matter is something and anti-matter is nothing. When something is added to the vacuum the anti-matter is displaced and only matter will now remains. If you were made out of anti-matter then your observable results would be the opposite. Matter and anti-matter cannot exist in the same space; only one of the two can exist in any place at any one time. When you remove matter from a space the only thing that can exisist in that space is anti-matter!
As soon as anti-matter comes in contact with matter, the two annihilate. As such, placing anti-matter into any container made of matter would result in both being annihilated. The only way to maintain anti-matter for any length of time is to keep it isolated from matter. Magnetic fields can do this for a short time, but invevitably the anti-matter and the matter meet each other.
An antonym for matter is anti-matter.
Yes. not only elements all particle in the universe are matter. From Sambit Pal India. *********************** Anti particles are not matter they are anti-matter.
Its not worth it not matter whAT!!
Ten dollars is worth $10, it does not matter where you take it.
Matter is anything except anti-matter, and matter occupies all of everything everywhere. Basically, yes. Unless you see anti-matter, which is doubtful because the anti-matter would implode upon contact with matter, which includes air.