Child slavery is ethically and legally wrong, and it is important to focus on ending it rather than discussing how much money a child slave might make. These children are often exploited and abused, and we should work towards protecting their rights and providing them with opportunities for education, safety, and a better future.
A slave owner would likely prefer to use slaves, as they have no restrictions on their labor and are considered property. Indentured servants have contracts with set terms and conditions, making them less controllable compared to slaves.
This word comes from Pakistan, but that country is not the only place where this practice occurs. In Pakistan, there is something called "debt bondage," where parents who are in debt and very poor sell their children to businesses, to work off the debt. The children are paid slave wages, expected to work long hours, and are often treated badly, but the parents get some of the money they need to pay their debts, while their child or children then work to pay off the money that the parents were given. This practice of giving an advance on the debt is called "peshgi." I enclose a link about this system of bonded labor.
The slave elite in the Safavid Empire were known as the Qizilbash. They were Turkic tribal warriors who played a significant role in the military and political affairs of the empire.
Slaves can theoretically become slave owners by gaining freedom, acquiring wealth or power, and then purchasing or acquiring slaves. This scenario, however, is highly unlikely given the historical oppression and systemic barriers that prevent slaves from advancing to positions of power and privilege.
"Enslaved" is the correct spelling of the word, which means to be held captive and forced to work without pay or freedom. It refers to the state of being a slave, where one's rights and autonomy are taken away by another individual or group.
They were worth about $50 bucks
That child was also a slave.
slave chants
Slave* APEX**
The child of a slave woman and a free man was typically considered a slave under the principle of partus sequitur ventrem, meaning that the child's legal status followed that of the mother. This meant that even if the father was free, the child would still be considered a slave.
It would be property of the slave's owner.
A slave
A slave
A slave
A slave
Slavery is illegal so the profit would be zero.
Slave children were not allowed to read or write.