0
What else can I help you with?
What was the reason landowners would rather have slaves than servants?
In the realm of economics, the importance of slaves went well beyond the wealth generated from their uncompensated labor. Slavery was the flywheel on which America’s market revolution turned -- not just in the United States, but in all of the Americas. Enslaved peoples were investments(purchased and then rented out as laborers), credit (used to secure loans), property, commodities, and capital, making them an odd mix of abstract and concrete value. Collateral for loans and items for speculation, slaves were also objects of nostalgia, mementos of a fading aristocratic world even as they served as the coin for the creation of a new commercialized one.Slaves literally made money: working in Lima’s mint, they trampled quicksilver into ore with their bare feet, pressing toxic mercury into their bloodstream in order to amalgamate the silver used for coins. And they were money -- at least in a way. It wasn’t that the value of individual slaves was standardized in relation to currency, but that slaves were quite literally the standard. When appraisers calculated the value of any given hacienda, or estate, slaves usually accounted for over half of its worth; they were, that is, much more valuable than inanimate capital goods like tools and millworks. Follow the money.
Should slaves be counted in the population?
The issue of counting slaves in the population is complex and has historical implications. In terms of representation, counting slaves would have given slaveholding states more political power in early American history. However, excluding slaves would have misrepresented the true population size. Ultimately, the decision to count slaves as part of the population was a compromise reached during the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.
What problems did the freed slaves have?
Nothing really, but if they were runaways then their problems would be trying their best not to get caught. If they were caught, normally they would get whipped, sometimes killed depending on the circumstances.
How are unionist and confedrate views different?
Well, during the civil war, the confederates (south), thought that all slaves should stay slaves. The unionists thought all slaves should be free. So, therefor the confederates did not like Lincoln for the US president, So they would try to secede from the US and if they would the would call themselves the Confederate States Of America. Lincoln did not want this, so, this is how the civil war started. Till this day, people in some parts of the south still think the way there ancestors did many years ago.
Why are stairs used as a opposed to just jumping up to another lever?
It's because no one can jump that high and stairs makes it possible, but it would be a shorter distance to just jump rather than using the stairs.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indetured servants?
A landowner may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and potentially more cost-effective labor source compared to indentured servants who were only bound for a fixed period. Slaves were also seen as having less legal rights and were less likely to challenge their owners, giving landowners more control over their workforce.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves then indentured slaves?
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and have lifelong servitude, while indentured servants have a set period of servitude and can demand compensation or freedom after their term is complete. This gives landowners more control and long-term labor security with slaves.
What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants.?
Since slavery was for life, I slave provided more years of work. Apex
What these is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.
Why would owners of large plantations rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Why would owners of large plantations rather slaves than indentured servants?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Why would landower rather use slaves than indentured servents?
Landowners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong and inheritable source of labor, while indentured servants could only work for a limited period of time. Slaves were also considered to be a more profitable and reliable workforce as they were seen as a long-term investment. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time often justified the use of slaves over indentured servants.
Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.
What would plantation owners prefer slaves instead of indentured servants?
they coulld use slaves longer
Why would a land owner rather use slaves over indentured servants?
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves do not have set terms of service and can be owned for life, providing a more long-term and stable labor force. Slaves also offer less risk of running away or quitting compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is complete. Additionally, slaves are considered property and provide a more complete control over their labor.
