answersLogoWhite

0

Since slavery was for life, I slave provided more years of work. Apex

User Avatar

Anonymous

4y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about U.S. History

What was an indentured survent?

Indentured servitude was a type of forced labor in early America. It was most prevalent in Jamestown and other early colonies. Basically, how it works is: Steve wants to go to America from the old world, but is too poor to pay for boat passage. Henry is rich and going to America, and tells Steve, "Hey, if you work for me for a few years (commonly about 4, later around 7 years) I'll pay for your passage to America." However, indentured servants would SELDOM, if ever, live out their contracts. For this reason, many people say the system of indentured servitude was the same as the institution of non-racial slavery, because the indentured servants worked for no pay for the rest of their lives. The system of indentured servitude started to collapse when servants started to outlive their contracts. It was replaced before long by a racial system of slavery brought to the present-day lower 48 states from the Caribbean.


What was one reason why sharecropping began in the South?

One reason sharecropping began in the South was the economic devastation following the Civil War, which left many landowners without the means to farm their land and freed slaves seeking work. Sharecropping provided a way for landowners to maintain their agricultural production by allowing these laborers to farm their land in exchange for a share of the crops, rather than paying wages. This system became a means of survival for both parties but often led to cycles of debt and poverty for the sharecroppers.


One reason for the shift toward slave labor in the late 1600s was that?

slaves did not compete with planters for land and political privilege as freed servants did


Who is the owners of large tracts of land in Middle Colonies?

Large landowners are people who own large lands and have lots of crops fruits and vegetables the reason they get to grow that , cause they have rich soil which makes vegetables, fruits, and grains grow


Was the Civil War fought in vain?

Not at all. Many people don't know that the civil war was fought for more than one reason. - Abolishment of slavery - Civil Rights - Rights of the people, and land for landowners. No, without the civil war, our economy and civil leadership wouldn't be what it is today.

Related Questions

What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves then indentured slaves?

Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and have lifelong servitude, while indentured servants have a set period of servitude and can demand compensation or freedom after their term is complete. This gives landowners more control and long-term labor security with slaves.


What these is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.


A reason why landowners would have slaves rather than indented servants?

Landowners might prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent labor force that could provide long-term economic benefits. Slaves were considered property that could be bought, sold, and inherited, providing a sense of control and ownership that was not possible with indentured servants who had fixed terms of service. Additionally, the institution of slavery allowed landowners to exploit and profit from free labor without having to worry about wages, contracts, or the expiration of servitude.


Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.


How were immigrants similar to indentured servants?

There are quite a few reasons why immigrants are similar to indentured servants. The biggest reason that the two are alike is because they are denied certain rights available to others in the community.


What of these reason plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather than indentured servants?

Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property, providing a long-term source of labor with no freedom or rights. Slaves could be inherited and their children born into slavery, ensuring a continuous workforce. In contrast, indentured servants had limited terms of service and some legal protections, making them less profitable and reliable for plantation owners.


Why did colonial masters first adopt the institution of indentured servitude rather than Indian or black slavery?

Early on, there was a steady stream of white, indentured servants coming from England to the New World. Many were promised land after completing their services and were therefore eager to work. The main reason colonial masters opted for this option was because these indentured servants were much cheaper than African and Indian slaves. After Bacon's rebellion however, and after an economic upturn in England which kept laborers home, indentured servants became a less desirable option. At this point, the slave trade had opened up and indentured servants were seen as too difficult to control.


What is the reason plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather than indentured servants?

Slaves were owned as property, but indentured servants were white people who signed a 7 year contract for transportation to the colonies. They could also blend in with the population while anyone who was black was a slave.


Why did former indentured servants threaten the colonial elite in the Chesapeake and why?

For this answer, you should look at Bacon's Rebellion- Where Nathanial Bacon revolted against the governor of Virginia, attempting to burn down all of Jamestown. The reason the former indentured servants threatened the elit is because Bacon's mob was comprised of jaded indentured servants (who were getting the short end of the stick when it came to land) and African slaves. After the uprising, none of the wealthy settlers wanted to hire indentured servants, so they turned to African slavery as their main means of labor.


What was the reason Sir Edwin Sandy's wanted more women to come to Jamestown as indentured servants?

men will work harder if they had their familys


Which of these is a reason plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather then indentured servants?

Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a long-term and inheritable source of labor, providing more stability and control over their workforce. Additionally, slaves did not have the legal protections and rights that indentured servants possessed, making them easier to exploit and control. Finally, the racial hierarchy and beliefs of the time perpetuated the notion that Africans and their descendants were inferior and thus suitable for enslavement.


What was the reason sir Edwin Sandys wanted more women to come to Jamestown as indentured servants?

Men would work harder if they had families.