Serfs did not have fiefs. They were bound to the soil and not allowed to leave it. The arrival of a new lord did not change this. Nevertheless, the serfs were largely free to farm as they pleased. The condition of the serfs was not slavery, but a different sort of thing governed by a sort of contract in which the serfs and the lords each had obligations to the other. The serfs had to pay rent in some form, labor, part of the crop, or money. For his part the lord had to provide a place to live, fields to farm, and protection in such difficult times as war or famine. The serfs were not allowed to leave the land, and the lords were not allowed to force them off of it. The serfs had reeves to organize them. The reeves were also serfs and were often elected by the serfs on a manor. The reeves decided how the serfs would be organized for their common labor, what fields would be tilled and what crops planted, and what parcels would go to which family for their own use.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
AnswerThe nobility. They were slaves. AnswerThe serfs were not slaves. They were not free, as they were bound to the land they lived on, but they could not be bought or sold, and they could not be taken off the land by the lord any more than they could leave it without his permission. Doubtless they sometimes did work as servants, but usually they were agricultural, and they were much more likely to take work doing simple labor than as servants. There were reeves, who organized and supervised the serfs on manors, and who acted as representatives for the lords to the serfs and for the serfs to the lords. The reeves, however, were also serfs, and were often elected by the serfs annually. There are links below.
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
Serfs owed crops to their lords.Apex.
they had no money
Serfs ate a lot of brown bread and soup. They also had vegetables that they grew. They usually did not have access to much meat or rich foods.
Serfs did not have fiefs. They were bound to the soil and not allowed to leave it. The arrival of a new lord did not change this. Nevertheless, the serfs were largely free to farm as they pleased. The condition of the serfs was not slavery, but a different sort of thing governed by a sort of contract in which the serfs and the lords each had obligations to the other. The serfs had to pay rent in some form, labor, part of the crop, or money. For his part the lord had to provide a place to live, fields to farm, and protection in such difficult times as war or famine. The serfs were not allowed to leave the land, and the lords were not allowed to force them off of it. The serfs had reeves to organize them. The reeves were also serfs and were often elected by the serfs on a manor. The reeves decided how the serfs would be organized for their common labor, what fields would be tilled and what crops planted, and what parcels would go to which family for their own use.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Serfs are Islamic
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Many of the people who lived in medieval villages were serfs, and there were times when serfs worked in exchange for rent and protection, rather than for pay Villagers who were not serfs generally were paid, though they might have been given room and board as part of the work arrangement, and very little money.
There are no serfs in Russia today.
Serfs who were agricultural workers got a place to live, most of the farm production, and protection in exchange for some of the farm production or labor. Some jobs serfs did were not agricultural. For example, some serfs specialized in transportation, as teamsters or boatmen or rivers. These were likely to be given a place to live and money in exchange for labor.
AnswerThe nobility. They were slaves. AnswerThe serfs were not slaves. They were not free, as they were bound to the land they lived on, but they could not be bought or sold, and they could not be taken off the land by the lord any more than they could leave it without his permission. Doubtless they sometimes did work as servants, but usually they were agricultural, and they were much more likely to take work doing simple labor than as servants. There were reeves, who organized and supervised the serfs on manors, and who acted as representatives for the lords to the serfs and for the serfs to the lords. The reeves, however, were also serfs, and were often elected by the serfs annually. There are links below.
Serfs were barely above slaves themselves. I doubt any serfs ever owned slaves.
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.