there is alot of valocity in a coster but no where near as much as when i wo raggin her last night there is alot of valocity in a coster but no where near as much as when i wo raggin her last night
the roller coaster would crack and break apart because of the velocity. It is to much for a roller coaster to handle.
I don't think it would be a matter of age as much as it would be one of height. Most rollercoasters want you to be about 54' inches tall or so. So I think, as long as you're tall enough, age should not be a factor.
well a steam roller would probably cost more than a 1000 so 3000 dollars.
It's phycotic. You need a lobabamoty. Otherwise, you'd know that you need 2!
Roller blades are much faster and better. The roller skates are not as flexible as roller blades are. It's much safer to wear roller blades than roller skates and roller skates are likely to trip you up than roller blades. Also roller blades have more control than roller skates.
A roller-coaster would go faster with more people in it because with moer people the better the ride alsothe people that are ridding will give the roller-coaster potential energy. A roller-coaster would go slower with an empty car will give the roller-coaster kinetic energy than with peolpe in it.
How much does a IR DD-65 Roller weigh
that would depend on the weight of every person, and the weight of the roller coaster..and also the speed at which they are traveling
The kinetic energy of the roller coaster can be calculated using the formula KE = 0.5 * mass * velocity^2. Plugging in the values, KE = 0.5 * 3000 kg * (30 m/s)^2 = 1,350,000 Joules.
Roller blinds keep light out of windows. They roll up instead of accordingly up. They're very cute, I love them very much. I would suggest them to people!
The answer is the roller coaster is much more sexyer
a) doubled b) tripled c) doubled (assuming the engine is used to bring it back to the same speed) d) quadrupled e) halved