Asked in Jokes and RiddlesTongue Twisters
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
February 10, 2018 6:16AM
This is an American English language tongue-twister that is used to train children to master speech, set in a fun rhyme of alike sounding words. The answer given within the tongue twister is: "A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could if a woodchuck could chuck wood."
NOTE: In real life, Woodchucks (groundhogs) do NOT really chuck wood. Read below for some humorous answers to this perplexing tongue twister.
Woodchucks Chucking Wood
The amount of wood that woodchucks would chuck on a given day varies greatly with the individual woodchuck. According to a Wall Street Journal article, New York State wildlife expert Richard Thomas found that a woodchuck could chuck around 35 cubic feet of dirt in the course of digging a burrow. Thomas reasoned that if a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would chuck an amount equal to 700 pounds.
Some say it depends on three factors:
- The woodchuck's desire to chuck said wood.
- The woodchuck's need to chuck the aforementioned wood.
- The woodchuck's ability to chuck the wood when it is a woodchuck
- The woodchuck could chuck as much wood as he wanted!
- "Sixteen and 1/2 board feet a day- except on Groundhog's Day since groundhog is another name for woodchuck."- This answer is according to no less an authority than the 'Junior Woodchucks Guidebook', a publication often consulted by Huey, Dewey, and Louie Duck and referred to yet again by them in answering this very same question.
- How Chuck Norris got involved-A woodchuck would only chuck as much would as Chuck Norris would allow it to, because the woodchuck shares Chuck's name. Therefore, Chuck must punish it and make it chuck as much wood as Chuck can. So, a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as Chuck could.
- None because a wood chuck cannot chuck wood!
- Approximately 3.9675 pounds every 5.6843 seconds. So there.
- 2.865 lbs every 11.3686 Seconds?
- As much as he needed to be satisfied.
- It could chuck a lot. But it definitely couldn't chuck Chuck Norris.
- A group of people actually did a study on this. None of the woodchucks ate any wood planks so they never upchucked it but some of them chucked them (threw them) at people.
- During my study of Woodchuck I came to the conclusion that woodchucks don't chuck wood but only drink beer. However, this beer can frequently motivate them towards actions that can closely resemble the chucking of wood.
- A woodchuck will only chuck certain wood, likely that which is found in their natural, prairie habitat. Therefore, the lack of trees on the prairie is quite closely related to the chucking of wood performed by these wood-chucking woodchucks.
- Since it is the same animal as the Groundhog, should we not instead ask : how much ground would a groundhog hog if a groundhog would hog ground.
- The above is pretty goood, but I think that the groundhog would be hogging sod.
- 315g. This was an estimate done in a book of useless trivia.
- A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck - if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
- About as many good cookies a good cook could cook, if a good cook could cook cookies good.
- About as many boards as the bored Mongol hordes would hoard if the bored Mongol hordes did hoard boards in gourds.
- He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, he would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
- If he could chuck wood, the woodchuck would chuck as much as he could!
- If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would and should chuck wood. But if woodchucks can't chuck wood, they shouldn't and wouldn't chuck wood. Though were I a woodchuck, and I chucked wood, I would chuck wood with the best woodchucks that chucked wood.
- If a woodchuck could chuck wood, then s/he'd chuck all the wood, s/he'd chuck and chuck and chuck and chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
- It would chuck the amount of wood equal to the seashells that sweet Suzy Shoreham sells by the seashore divided by how many primary pickled peppers Peter Piper picks.
- One quarter of a sycamore if you give him a quarter for every quarter of the sycamore he cut.
- It might depend on how many female woodchucks were present. Or, it could depend on whether the woodchuck's mother-in-law was around or not. If she was, he'd be chucking all day. If not, he'd be watching the football game.
- Some maintain that woodchucks could not and would not chuck wood at all.
- It depends on how good his dentures are!
- A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. But unfortunately, woodchucks do not chuck wood.
- About 5.72 fluid litres of wood
- About as many boards as the Mongol hoards would hoard if the Mongol hordes did hoard boards.
- Tons. More than you can count. Honestly. No one can chuck more would than a woodchuck.
- If the woodchuck's name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it.
- Due to the average size of a woodchuck and the general density of wood (not including cork [which is actually bark]) if a woodchuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the woodchuck is functioning correctly.
- Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
- A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck until Chuck Norris got there.
- As much wood as a wood chuck could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood.
Here are more answers from our members:
Oddly enough, this is just one of many oral exercises employed by auctioneers. Using a sing-song method of delivery, varying the syllabic emphasis, and testing themselves to see how many times the question and answer can be repeated in one breath while being heard and understood by an audience, is how they hone their harmonic skill.
Woodchucks can't chuck wood and they were only named that because the English men who found it could not pronounce the Indian version and settled for this. But if woodchucks could they would probably chuck about 700 pounds of it (true scientific evidence backs this up).
A woodchuck would chuck ALL of the wood if a woodchuck could chuck wood!
Well assuming its a fairly large woodchuck and its early adulthood, he would be able to chuck about 90-110 pounds of wood an hour.
Actually, it is more likely that global warming or the volcano located at Yellowstone will kill us all before a woodchuck could chuck wood.
This depends on several decisive factors:
1. The size of the woodchuck in question.
2. The density of the wood.
3. The position function of the woodchuck [f(w)] in relation to the wood [w].
4. The velocity [v=f'(w)] and acceleration [a=dv/dw; or a= f"(w)] with respect to the woodchuck and the chucking.
5. Given an interval [t], integrate the function [f(w)] allowing for [a] and [v].
There you have it, the area under the curve. (I.E. HOW MUCH A
WOOD A WOODCHUCK CAN CHUCK).
He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Could "chuck wood"??? ...as much as you give him greedy lil critter!!!
March 12, 2016 9:24PM
Rhymes and tongue-twisters have been used for centuries to amuse