answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The movie took liberties with history but most films do; but here are some areas where Hollywood and history diverged. First. and possibly least important, Sir William Wallace was never called "Braveheart" and while Wallace did kill an Englishman it was not for the rape and murder of his wife but for an unspecified insult. Of course, the Mel Gibson version makes for better drama. Next in the Battle of Stirling Bridge, Gibson left out the bridge -- he explained that it made for better cinematography to leave out the bridge (and the film might have gone over budget for the construction costs of a bridge) so Gibson had them fight it out in an open field. Next, Scots warriors of Sir William's time did NOT wear war paint into battle (they did that during Roman times). And finally, Robert the Bruce, who led the victorious war of Scottish independence, was not quite the conniving cad depicted in "Braveheart." Like Wallace, Bruce (an ancestor of mine) is a national hero of Scotland. Whatever the film's historic flaws, however, it contributed to a rebirth of Scottish nationalism among native Scots and their kin overseas.

User Avatar

Wiki User

โˆ™ 2008-08-15 18:12:43
This answer is:
User Avatar
Study guides

Movies

20 cards

If your boyfriend had blue eyes as a baby an brown eyes when he got older an you have blue eyes what color of eyes would the baby have

What is an interrogative pronoun

What is a participial adjective

Which of the following is a true statement about discriminatory language

โžก๏ธ
See all cards
3.97
โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…
64 Reviews

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How near to reality is the movie Braveheart?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
People also asked