its a good place to research but its not always reliable.
It's as reliable as Wikipedia.
wikipedia but its not the most reliable sorce
Compare the site to at least two other good sites, then see if Wikipedia has the same information and facts. If it does, the site's reliable. If Wikipedia disagrees with the information on that site, Wikipedia's lying, and the site is reliable.
Wikipedia has been shown to be a reliable source of information that is constantly up to date and where it is possible to bring corrections to articles where needed. I think you can rely on the information there.
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
WIKIPEDIA
Probably Wikipedia. It has reliable resources on there.
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
Wikipedia has a whole page on every single thing you need to know about plasma display. Many people criticize wikipedia for false information but wikipedia has reliable information because it is factual and everything has a reference for proof.
The internet is not the most reliable but sometimes the only source, as some information can only be found there.
No, it is generally not recommended to cite Wikipedia as a source in a research paper because it is not considered a reliable or scholarly source.
Wikipedia, but if you want reliable then encyclopedia Britannica. _________ Independent studies have shown that the degrees of accuracy between Wikipedia and Britannica are not significantly different.