answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Evaluate said evidence and accept it if it is valid. Unfortunately, scientists are all too human and some hold on to ideas that are no longer supported by the evidence, especially if the idea is theirs. That is why consensus and peer review is important in science.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

At this point, the information that is already thought to be true is reassessed. This new information or evidence is also assessed. Scientists perform many tests and research both sets of information in an effort to find out where, how, and why, these ideas differ and, if possible, how they can be interrelated. Remember that science is not stable and can be changed as new information is presented and new things discovered.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

the theory could be altered

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How should scientists respond when new evidence that challenges current ideas is presented?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are Kellogg's current challenges?

eating nuts?


Where is senior debt presented on financial statements?

Current Liabilities


What is evidence that an electrical current produces a magnetic field?

The deflection of a magnetic compass in the presence of an electric current, is evidence that an electric current produces a magnetic field.


What current problems are scientists solving?

COVID?


The total opposition to an alternating current presented by a circuit is called a?

impedance


What is the underlying cause of many of East Africa's current challenges?

Disease


Why did most scientists not believe in Pangaea?

Because the earth was thought to be made by god, and it was perfect and no continental crusts. The existence of continental crusts is one of the many evidence that proved Pangaea to be a theory. Also, the existence of the fossil records of the same species along the coastlines of 2 different places confirms Pangea. The current movements in earth's crust also provide evidence that Pangaea could have formed. Most scientists were not given this data and therefore the evidence for Pangaea was vague. Only now has the evidence shown more consistency. Science is skeptical my friend.


What is your current job and what you do and what is your current employer's profile and what are your major challenges and why would you be willing to leave your current employer?

my current job is teaching geology and i have applied to do seimic survey


What are the challenges and opportunites of electoral reforms in nigeria?

i was given an assignment , I'm not current i was given an assignment , I'm not current i was given an assignment , I'm not current


Notary Documents presented for identification must be current or?

Or the notary should refuse to perform the notarization.


What current NFL coach has won the most red flag challenges?

Tom Coughlin


What evidence supports the current theory of the origin of the moon?

rocks