answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How the following statement nothing in science can be absolutely proven no matter how much evidence is collected.?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Where is physical evidence found and collected?

Where is Physical Evidence found and collected?


How was the evidence for hubble law collected?

The hubble law was collected by cameras


Which of the following statement about interpreting historical evidence is true?

New sources and ideas may change the interpreting of events


Can bank statement be used as evidence of reimbursement in court?

ABSOLUTELY!! Just make sure you have multiple copies and have the bank teller sign off on the sheet.


What are pieces of information collected during an investigation?

evidence


What following Characteristic of a good thesis statement?

A good thesis statement is clear and specific, presenting a concise argument that can be supported with evidence. It should be relevant to the topic and guide the reader on what to expect in the rest of the paper.


What evidence would be collected from a fire scene?

an evidence would be inside of the house like how to fire started


How evidence is examined?

I honestly have absolutely no clue.


Can good scientific analysis can overcome poorly collected evidence?

In certain cases in could but in a general term no it cannot, poorly collected evidence could contaminate it or even if obtained wrong could be thrown out and not be used as evidence that is why there are procedures to be followed.


What problems do investigators face when evidence is not thoroughly collected?

They cannot retry! Evidence is sometimes wrong!Added: If evidence is not completely, properly and thoroughly collected or processed, and documented it is subject to being challenged by the defense which might throw its reliability into question.


If blood evidence is dried before it's collected is it admissible in court?

Most blood samples collected at crime scenes IS dried. It is easily reconstituted without degrading the cellular evidence it contains.


When an attorney gives a statement of disapproval about evidence from the opposing side what is that statement called?

He is challenging the "admissability" of the evidence (i.e.- he is saying that it is "nadmissable").