Yes
Yes
This is referred to as an ad hominem attack (Latin to the man), attempting to invalidate the argument by making charges against the person making the argument.
The fallacy in the argument presented is called ad hominem, which involves attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself.
Ad hominem is a Latin term meaning "to the person." It is a type of logical fallacy where an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument, rather than addressing the points they are making. This type of argument is considered invalid as it does not directly address the issue at hand.
Ad Hominem fallacy - it occurs when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. This fallacy is committed when one tries to refute an argument by attacking the person's character, motive, or other attribute.
The ad hominem fallacy is based on attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself. It involves attempting to undermine an argument by criticizing the person's character, motives, or personal traits.
An ad hominem argument is when someone attacks the person making an argument instead of addressing the argument itself. This type of fallacy is meant to discredit the person rather than engaging with the actual points being made.
A fallacy where a claim or argument is dismissed because of the person making it, rather than the evidence or logic presented. It focuses on attacking the person's character or traits instead of addressing the argument itself.
An ad hominem fallacy is when an argument attacks a person's character or traits instead of addressing the actual issue being discussed. It is considered a logical fallacy because attacking the person making an argument does not invalidate the argument itself.
An ad hominem fallacy is when someone attacks the person making an argument instead of addressing the argument itself. It involves criticizing the characteristics or circumstances of the individual making the argument rather than the content of the argument itself. This type of fallacy is considered a weak form of argumentation because it does not address the actual logic or evidence presented in the argument.
An example of name-calling fallacy would be if someone dismissed an argument by calling the person making the argument a "liar" without providing any evidence to disprove the argument itself. This type of fallacy aims to attack the person rather than addressing the actual content of the argument.
Poor decision-making, flawed reasoning, and incorrect conclusions can be the results of a person's logic containing errors that weaken their argument.