answersLogoWhite

0

Post-structuralism may be understood as a critical response to the basic assumptions of structuralism. Structuralism was a fashionable movement in France in the 1950s and 1960s, that studied the underlying structures inherent in cultural products (such as texts), and utilizes analytical concepts from linguistics, psychology,anthropology and other fields to understand and interpret those structures. Although the structuralist movement fostered critical inquiry into these structures, it emphasized logical and scientific results. Many structuralists sought to integrate their work into pre-existing bodies of knowledge. This was observed in the work ofFerdinand de Saussure in linguistics, Claude Lévi-Strauss in anthropology, and many early twentieth-century psychologists.

The general assumptions of post-structuralism derive from critique of structuralist premises. Specifically, post-structuralism holds that the study of underlying structures is itself culturally conditioned and therefore subject to myriad biases and misinterpretations. To understand an object (e.g., one of the many meanings of a text), it is necessary to study both the object itself, and the systems of knowledge which were coordinated to produce the object. In this way, post-structuralism positions itself as a study of how knowledge is produced.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

The notion that language is arbitrary and that no truly objective truth or meaning can be created outside of a culture's confines originated with what theories?

This notion originated with theories of structuralism and poststructuralism. Structuralism, notably developed by Ferdinand de Saussure, argued that language shapes our perception of reality. Poststructuralist thinkers like Jacques Derrida further emphasized the indeterminacy and instability of meaning in language, suggesting that objective truth is elusive.


What is the difference between bloomfield's structuralism and saussure's structuralism?

what is the difference between bloomfield 's structuralism and saussure's structuralism


What are the key differences between postmodernism and poststructuralism?

Postmodernism is a broader cultural movement that questions traditional beliefs and values, while poststructuralism is a specific philosophical approach that focuses on language and power dynamics. Postmodernism critiques grand narratives and embraces diversity, while poststructuralism deconstructs language to reveal hidden meanings and power structures.


Is poststructuralism the same as social constructionism?

No these two concepts are different, but they do overlap.


A sentence using the word structuralism?

You just asked a question on Answers.com about 'structuralism'


What the definition of structuralism?

Structuralism was an intellectual movement concerned with the analysis of such things as language or myths.


Introspection is to structuralism as what is to behaviorism?

Introspection is to structuralism as observation is to behaviorism. Behaviorism focuses on observable behaviors, rather than thoughts or feelings, similar to how introspection is a method used to study the structure of consciousness in structuralism.


What are the example of structuralism?

building


What are structuralism examples?

building


Different between American and European structuralism?

American structuralism, influenced by Saussure, focused on binary oppositions and language structure, while in Europe, structuralism was more concerned with underlying structures that shape culture and society, as seen in the work of Levi-Strauss. Additionally, American structuralism was more concerned with formal analysis of texts, while European structuralism looked at broader social and historical contexts.


What is an important factor in post structuralism?

In Post Structuralism, it is necessary to study both the object and the systems of knowledge that made the object.


What has the author Andrew M Koch written?

Andrew M. Koch has written: 'Poststructuralism and the politics of method'